From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>
To: suparna@in.ibm.com
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Software Suspend Functionality in 2.5
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 23:49:57 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1046688385.1702.3.camel@laptop-linux.cunninghams> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030303122453.A2634@in.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 19:54, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:36:49PM +1300, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 17:28, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> > > If you add to that the possibility of being able to save more
> > > in less space if you have compression, would it be useful ?
> >
> > I'm not sure that it would because we don't know how much compression
> > we're going to get ahead of time, so we don't know how many extra pages
>
> The algorithm could be adjusted to deal with that, however ...
Ah I see. You're thinking of compressing the pages as we eat memory? I
guess I need to look at LKCD more closely. I think it can wait until we
get the basics of the expanded functionality sorted.
>
> > we can save. The compression/decompression also takes extra time and
> > puts more drain on a potentially low battery.
>
> .. I didn't think about the battery drain - valid point !
Of course that can be overcome too. The user simply starts swsusp
earlier or turns off compression if necessary.
Thanks for the thought provoking :>
Regards,
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-03 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-26 5:45 Software Suspend Functionality in 2.5 Nigel Cunningham
2003-02-27 12:42 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-27 18:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-02-28 6:47 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-28 13:05 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-28 13:39 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-28 13:44 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-28 15:18 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-28 15:17 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-28 18:59 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-03 4:28 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-03-03 6:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-03 6:54 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-03-03 10:49 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2003-03-03 12:25 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-03 13:06 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1046688385.1702.3.camel@laptop-linux.cunninghams \
--to=ncunningham@clear.net.nz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox