From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 03:18:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 03:18:49 -0500 Received: from [196.41.29.142] ([196.41.29.142]:11760 "EHLO workshop.saharact.lan") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 03:18:47 -0500 Subject: Re: Corruption problem with ext3 and htree From: Martin Schlemmer To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: Andreas Dilger , KML In-Reply-To: <20030311061911.GF1965@think.thunk.org> References: <20030307063940.6d81780e.azarah@gentoo.org> <20030306234819.Q1373@schatzie.adilger.int> <20030309063345.47046254.azarah@gentoo.org> <20030311061911.GF1965@think.thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1047371228.3512.46.camel@workshop.saharact.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2- Date: 11 Mar 2003 10:27:08 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:19, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Hmm... can you help construct a test case that doesn't rely on the > presence of the Gentoo distribution? Is there some way we can > instrument the python code so we can see the exact filesystem > operations (renames, deletions, moves, etc.) that is going on? The > good news is that you say that you're able to reproduce it every > single time, which implies it's not a timing related problem. > Ok, will try to get A short way to duplicate this. Regards, -- Martin Schlemmer