From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] NUMAQ subarchification
Date: 16 Mar 2003 08:36:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1047825416.4371.6.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303152353520.10374-100000@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu>
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 23:55, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2003, James Bottomley wrote:
> +config X86_DEFAULT_TOPOLOGY
> + bool
> + default y
> + depends on X86_PC || X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT || X86_BIGSMP
> +
The slight problem here is that topology isn't shared between default,
summit and numaq (or at least won't be when the #ifdef mess is removed
from the default), but summit and numaq would still like to share the
same topology file between them, which is going to add another level of
complexity to the Makefile solution.
On the whole, I think the least of the three evils is #including a .c
file.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-16 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-14 21:12 [patch] Summit support for pcibus <-> cpumask topology James Bottomley
2003-03-15 1:41 ` [patch] Summit support for pcibus <-> cpumask topology [1/2] Matthew Dobson
2003-03-15 1:43 ` [patch] Summit support for pcibus <-> cpumask topology [2/2] Matthew Dobson
2003-03-15 1:46 ` [patch] NUMAQ subarchification Matthew Dobson
2003-03-15 2:05 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-15 17:53 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-15 17:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-16 2:53 ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-03-16 3:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-16 5:05 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-16 5:55 ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-03-16 14:36 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2003-03-16 1:07 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-16 2:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-16 4:31 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-18 1:58 ` Matthew Dobson
2003-03-18 16:16 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-18 16:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1047825416.4371.6.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox