From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 09:29:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 09:29:24 -0500 Received: from nat9.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.137]:6151 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 09:29:23 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] NUMAQ subarchification From: James Bottomley To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-9) Date: 16 Mar 2003 08:36:51 -0600 Message-Id: <1047825416.4371.6.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 23:55, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > On 15 Mar 2003, James Bottomley wrote: > +config X86_DEFAULT_TOPOLOGY > + bool > + default y > + depends on X86_PC || X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT || X86_BIGSMP > + The slight problem here is that topology isn't shared between default, summit and numaq (or at least won't be when the #ifdef mess is removed from the default), but summit and numaq would still like to share the same topology file between them, which is going to add another level of complexity to the Makefile solution. On the whole, I think the least of the three evils is #including a .c file. James