public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Peter Lundkvist <p.lundkvist@telia.com>, akpm@digeo.com, mingo@elte.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c)
Date: 29 Mar 2003 18:23:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048980204.13757.17.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E8610EA.8080309@telia.com>

On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 16:32, Peter Lundkvist wrote:

> I have seen long delays when starting e.g. xterm from my
> window manager (sawfish) either by keyboard-shortcut or by
> menu command (by mouse) starting from 2.5.65. Sometimes it
> starts immediately, sometimes after up to 2 seconds (idle
> system). If I start a new xterm from xterm it always start
> immediately. 2.5.64 always behaved OK.

You are not alone...

> My first try to solve this problem  was to use some
> scheduler parameters from 2.6.64:
>     #define MAX_TIMESLICE         (300 * HZ / 1000)
>     #define CHILD_PENALTY         95
>     #define MAX_SLEEP_AVG         (2*HZ)
>     #define STARVATION_LIMIT      (2*HZ)
> 
> but got the same behaviour.

Expected.

> 2nd try was to use sched.c, sched.h from 2.5.64 in a
> 2.5.66 build + one line patch in fork.c:
> -       p->last_run = jiffies;
> +       p->sleep_timestamp = jiffies;
> 
> Now the system behaves as it should!

This seems to confirm it was one of the interactivity changes that went
into 2.5.65.  I figured as much but it is nice to get confirmation. 
Thank you for trying this.

Now to figure out which one...

> My system is a P-III 700 (Inspiron 4000),
> and Debian (X is running at nice = -10).

I wonder if the reniced X is a factor?

	Robert Love


  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-29 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-29 21:32 Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c) Peter Lundkvist
2003-03-29 23:23 ` Robert Love [this message]
2003-03-30  1:21   ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-03-30  2:05     ` Robert Love
2003-03-30  2:33       ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-30  2:46         ` Robert Love
2003-03-30  3:58           ` Tom Sightler
2003-03-30  5:23             ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-30 19:24               ` Tom Sightler
2003-04-01  1:41               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-03-30 14:14           ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-30 21:06             ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-31  2:23               ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-31  6:35                 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-31  7:05                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-31  8:46                     ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-03-31  8:54                     ` Nick Piggin
2003-04-20  3:55                       ` Mike Galbraith
2003-04-18 13:58                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-30 10:16       ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-03-30 11:18   ` Mika Liljeberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1048980204.13757.17.camel@localhost \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=p.lundkvist@telia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox