From: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>
To: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: allow percentile size of tmpfs (2.5.66 / 2.4.20-pre2)
Date: 01 Apr 2003 20:26:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1049221575.7628.14.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ovn0jakwy7.fsf@sap.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 435 bytes --]
Am Die, 2003-04-01 um 18.24 schrieb Christoph Rohland:
> But on these systems you better use ramfs.
Just curious: Why? I'm using tmpfs on these systems and I'm rather
satisfied with it; especially the option to limit the amount of space
makes it rather useful. According to the documentation ramfs is most
useful as an educational example how to write filesystems not as a
real filesystem...
--
Servus,
Daniel
[-- Attachment #2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-01 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-01 14:22 PATCH: allow percentile size of tmpfs (2.5.66 / 2.4.20-pre2) Mikael Starvik
2003-04-01 16:24 ` Christoph Rohland
2003-04-01 18:26 ` Daniel Egger [this message]
2003-04-01 19:25 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-01 19:57 ` Daniel Egger
2003-04-02 7:13 ` Christoph Rohland
2003-04-02 7:55 ` Hua Zhong
2003-04-02 10:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-03 2:49 ` Robert White
2003-04-03 2:54 ` Hua Zhong
[not found] <fa.eagpkml.m3elbd@ifi.uio.no>
2003-04-01 13:38 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-04-01 14:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-01 14:18 ` CaT
2003-04-01 16:27 ` Christoph Rohland
2003-04-01 16:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-02 7:20 ` Christoph Rohland
2003-04-02 8:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-02 14:44 ` CaT
2003-04-02 17:33 ` Christoph Rohland
2003-04-02 20:44 ` Jörn Engel
2003-04-02 21:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-03 7:44 ` Jörn Engel
2003-04-07 8:32 ` Christoph Rohland
2003-04-07 11:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-07 11:59 ` Christoph Rohland
2003-04-04 11:31 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-04-03 5:35 ` CaT
2003-04-03 10:42 ` CaT
2003-04-02 10:04 ` Jörn Engel
2003-04-03 2:54 ` Robert White
2003-04-03 8:35 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-03 20:55 ` Robert White
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-01 8:10 CaT
2003-04-01 10:59 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-04-01 11:11 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-01 14:23 ` CaT
2003-04-01 14:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-04-01 14:54 ` CaT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1049221575.7628.14.camel@localhost \
--to=degger@fhm.edu \
--cc=cr@sap.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox