From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:00:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:00:39 -0500 Received: from B583e.pppool.de ([213.7.88.62]:17311 "EHLO nicole.de.interearth.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:00:37 -0500 Subject: Re: PATCH: allow percentile size of tmpfs (2.5.66 / 2.4.20-pre2) From: Daniel Egger To: Christoph Rohland Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" In-Reply-To: References: <3C6BEE8B5E1BAC42905A93F13004E8AB017DE982@mailse01.se.axis.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Z3UmOoI+d7Y+pyZesa47" Organization: Message-Id: <1049221575.7628.14.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 01 Apr 2003 20:26:15 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-Z3UmOoI+d7Y+pyZesa47 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Die, 2003-04-01 um 18.24 schrieb Christoph Rohland: > But on these systems you better use ramfs. Just curious: Why? I'm using tmpfs on these systems and I'm rather satisfied with it; especially the option to limit the amount of space makes it rather useful. According to the documentation ramfs is most useful as an educational example how to write filesystems not as a=20 real filesystem... --=20 Servus, Daniel --=-Z3UmOoI+d7Y+pyZesa47 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+idnHchlzsq9KoIYRAsglAKC4Q29ylhEjcgYWIpfYTgfNWUuUAQCeJjeH nFtTTpRMjgpG5TM9bhlsIMA= =1FmF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Z3UmOoI+d7Y+pyZesa47--