From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264126AbTDJSAL (for ); Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:00:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264127AbTDJSAL (for ); Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:00:11 -0400 Received: from pcp701542pcs.bowie01.md.comcast.net ([68.50.82.18]:38121 "EHLO lucifer.gotontheinter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264126AbTDJSAJ (for ); Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:00:09 -0400 Subject: Re: glibc+sysenter sources..? From: Disconnect To: lkml In-Reply-To: <20030409211042.GA29819@nevyn.them.org> References: <1049913600.18782.24.camel@sparky> <20030409211042.GA29819@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1049998110.1263.50.camel@sparky> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 10 Apr 2003 14:08:31 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 17:10, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:40:00PM -0400, Disconnect wrote: > > I found the binaries (ftp://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibc/2.3.1-25/) > > but the sources don't seem to be available. (That makes it hard to > > test, since my 2.5 system is running debian..) > Just get a recent version of glibc. 2.3.2 includes the patches, I > think. That'll be in Debian/unstable in another week or so I bet. Probably, but I'm running testing (I like it to at least -mostly- work ;) ..) and still would prefer the 2.3.1 patches. (Among other things, its easier to test changes if you do them in small batches; a libc upgrade from 2.3.1 to 2.3.2 is hardly 'small'. And the 2.3.2 changelog doesn't mention sysenter specifically, although I haven't read it in detail to see if its mentioned obliquely.) Since the binaries are being distributed there, I had expected to find sources in the same place.. or at least -somewhere-.. -- Disconnect