From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262658AbTDMWzp (for ); Sun, 13 Apr 2003 18:55:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262657AbTDMWzp (for ); Sun, 13 Apr 2003 18:55:45 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:19725 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262656AbTDMWzo (for ); Sun, 13 Apr 2003 18:55:44 -0400 Subject: Re: Preempt on PowerPC/SMP appears to leak memory From: Robert Love To: Marc-Christian Petersen Cc: David Brown , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200304140103.26761.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> References: <20030412152951.GA10367@codewhore.org> <1050271044.767.7.camel@localhost> <200304140103.26761.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1050275256.767.9.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 (1.2.4-2) Date: 13 Apr 2003 19:07:36 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 19:03, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > This is an incremental diff snipplet. The second preempt_disable(); should be > a preempt_enable(); no? Yep. Thanks. Robert Love