From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262837AbTDYB2Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262856AbTDYB2Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:16 -0400 Received: from miranda.zianet.com ([216.234.192.169]:61706 "HELO miranda.zianet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262837AbTDYB2P (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:15 -0400 Subject: Re: How did the Spelling Police miss this one? From: Steven Cole To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Cc: "viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk" , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , Johannes Ruscheinski In-Reply-To: <200304241929_MC3-1-35E8-687A@compuserve.com> References: <200304241929_MC3-1-35E8-687A@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1051234759.22271.143.camel@spc> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk Date: 24 Apr 2003 19:39:19 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 17:25, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Al Viro wrote: > > > >> On the other hand, "canonicalize", while strange and new, unambiguously > >> means (b). > >> > >> Is there an already-existing word which means (b)? > > > >% webster normalize > > > There is a subtle difference between 'normal' and 'canonical', > but I can't quite put my finger on it. Another sense of "normal" is as in "normal vector", which is perpendicular or orthogonal to a surface. Orthogonal is a good description of what this thread has become, but that's normal. Steven