public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reserving an ATA interface
Date: 03 May 2003 19:08:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1051981705.7818.63.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1051981168.4107.58.camel@gaston>


> Such an interface can't really know what slot will be
> picked by ide_register_hw() and can't "prepare" the HWIF with
> special iops, so it won't be much harmed by the fact we are
> calling init_hwif_data, but still, we should ultimately think
> about splitting completely the fact of allocating an hwif slot,
> setting it up, and triggering a probe on it. Those are 3 different
> things that are currently mixed in bad ways. I don't beleive
> fixing that fits in the 2.6 timeframe though.

I just though about another possible crap, though I haven't looked
enough to be sure, but PCI interfaces with no device will trigger
a similar problem as "empty" ide-pmac interfaces in that sense that
they will change dma ops, possibly mmio ops, etc.... If they hold
no device, their hwif->present will not be set, and thus the hwif
slot can possibly get re-used by thing like ide-cs (or anybody else
that rely on ide_register_hw() to allocate a new slot) without
those changes to hwif done by the PCI interface beeing cleared.

So my patch may actually fix some cases there too.

Ben.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-03 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-03  9:33 Reserving an ATA interface Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-05-03 16:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-03 16:59   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-05-03 17:08     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2003-05-03 17:21       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-03 18:39         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-05-03 19:31           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-03 19:40             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-05-03 17:12     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-04  1:28       ` Andre Hedrick
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-03 21:24 Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1051981705.7818.63.camel@gaston \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox