public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: top stack (l)users for 2.5.69
Date: 7 May 2003 18:36:06 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052332566.752437@palladium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.53.0305070933450.11740@chaos

In article <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305070933450.11740@chaos>,
Richard B. Johnson <root@chaos.analogic.com> wrote:
>
>You know (I hope) that allocating stuff on the stack is not
>"bad". 

Allocating stuff on the stack _is_ bad if you allocate more than a few
hundred bytes. That's _especially_ true deep down in the call-sequence,
ie in device drivers, low-level filesystems etc.

The kernel stack is a very limited resource, with no protection from
overflow. Being lazy and using automatic variables is a BAD BAD thing,
even if it's syntactically easy and generates good code.

			Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-07 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-07 13:20 top stack (l)users for 2.5.69 Jörn Engel
2003-05-07 13:45 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-07 13:56   ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-07 14:16     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-07 17:13       ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-05-07 17:40         ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-07 18:12           ` Roland Dreier
2003-05-07 18:28             ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-07 18:44               ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-07 18:46               ` Roland Dreier
2003-05-07 19:30                 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-07 19:42                   ` Roland Dreier
2003-05-07 20:04                     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-07 20:23                       ` Roland Dreier
2003-05-07 20:42                       ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-08  9:06                         ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-08 11:33                         ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-08 12:00                           ` Helge Hafting
2003-05-08 15:42                           ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-09  8:57                             ` Miles Bader
2003-05-09 16:50                               ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-08 16:47                           ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-07 18:51               ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-07 19:22                 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-07 19:31                   ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-07 19:39                   ` Hua Zhong
2003-05-07 21:47                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-08 10:29           ` David Howells
2003-05-07 17:55         ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-07 16:20           ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-07 19:01         ` Dave Hansen
2003-05-07 20:06           ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-07 20:14             ` Dave Hansen
2003-05-08  8:41               ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-08 16:51                 ` Dave Hansen
2003-05-08 22:12                   ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-07 21:30         ` Jesse Pollard
2003-05-07 21:54           ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-07 22:01             ` Jesse Pollard
2003-05-07 14:33     ` Torsten Landschoff
2003-05-07 14:47       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-07 15:04         ` Torsten Landschoff
2003-05-07 16:01           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-08 15:36             ` Ingo Oeser
2003-05-08 18:04               ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-07 15:23         ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-07 15:47           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-07 16:49         ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-07 17:18           ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-07 17:40             ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-07 18:35               ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-07 19:45                 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-07 18:23             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-07 17:38           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-07 17:47             ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-07 14:49       ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-07 18:36   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2003-05-07 19:17     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-07 20:38       ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-07 21:27         ` Marcus Alanen
2003-05-07 21:27           ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-08 15:10         ` Ingo Oeser
2003-05-08 17:12           ` Randy.Dunlap
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-07 19:38 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-08 14:08 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-08 18:04 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-05-08 19:05   ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-08 21:00     ` Jonathan Lundell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1052332566.752437@palladium.transmeta.com \
    --to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox