From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755277Ab0D1QNJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:13:09 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:48640 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753218Ab0D1QNH (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:13:07 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Joe Perches Cc: Greg KH , Greg KH , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Scott Smedley , Jason Baldus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Harley Sweeten , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/staging/dt3155: Integrate 3 badly styled files into 1 clean file In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:00:30 PDT." <1272434430.23132.35.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20100329032301.GC27607@verge.net.au> <20100427230228.GB17260@kroah.com> <1272432603.23132.30.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100428053427.GA14510@kroah.com> <1272433474.23132.34.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100428055237.GA14978@suse.de> <1272434430.23132.35.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1272471159_4290P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:12:39 -0400 Message-ID: <10533.1272471159@localhost> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 128.173.14.107 localhost Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Info: (45) HELO_LOCALHOST X-Junkmail-Status: score=45/50, host=vivi.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020207.4BD85E78.014C,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-09-22 00:05:22, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1272471159_4290P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:00:30 PDT, Joe Perches said: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 22:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > I seem to be learning that you little taste. > > -ENOPARSE > > Choosing competing patches based on date received > order not quality is poor taste. So you're saying when Greg gets a somewhat ugly but passable patch 2 weeks ago, he's supposed to *just know* that you'll be submitting a possibly better one 2 weeks later and wait for it to show up? How is that supposed to work in reality? --==_Exmh_1272471159_4290P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFL2F53cC3lWbTT17ARAjOfAJ4i8f4GGHWfgpz4KrRmxUUTX5otuACfWqAf 3z8xX7pDYfajPjXTYVxl6WA= =0Trx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1272471159_4290P--