public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: RE: Aix7xxx unstable in 2.4.21-rc2? (RE: Linux 2.4.21-rc2)
Date: 23 May 2003 19:29:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1053732598.1951.13.camel@mulgrave> (raw)

    although I respect your maintainer's responsible and safe position, I'd like
    to state that version 6.2.28 has been in the latest pre-releases for quite some
    time, and the reason you invoked for removing it at -rc time was the lockups
    people still encounter with the version present in -rc3, perhaps to a lesser
    extent. These lockups *SEEM* to have vanished from 6.2.33 for people who
    complained previously. Moreover, the lockup I encountered on my systems was
    fixed and demonstrated by Justin to really be a locking bug, so this was not
    just a "let's see how it behaves" fix.
    
I think there's some misunderstanding about what a release candidate
is.  It's an attempt to see if a particular set of code is viable as the
released product.  Any bugs reported against a rc that are deemed
problems to the release need to be fixed, either by adding a simple and
easily verifiable bug fix or by reverting the problem code.

The bksend file on http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/linux/SRC/
representing the requested updates is 475k compressed.  There's no
definition of the phrase "simple and easily verifiable bug fix" I can
encompass that could be applied to a chunk of code that size.

In these circumstances, absent a simple fix for the problem, the only
choice seems to be reversion and trying to get the code base stable at
the beginning of the next -pre, which is the current decision.

James



             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-23 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-23 23:29 James Bottomley [this message]
2003-05-24  6:43 ` Aix7xxx unstable in 2.4.21-rc2? (RE: Linux 2.4.21-rc2) Willy Tarreau
2003-05-24 14:36   ` James Bottomley
2003-05-24 14:51     ` Justin T. Gibbs
2003-05-24 15:55       ` James Bottomley
2003-05-28 23:08     ` Bill Davidsen
2003-05-26  4:21   ` David S. Miller
2003-05-26  4:25   ` David S. Miller
2003-05-26  8:47     ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-05-26 17:58     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-05-26 22:44       ` Aix7xxx unstable in 2.4.21-rc2? David S. Miller
2003-05-26 18:42     ` Aix7xxx unstable in 2.4.21-rc2? (RE: Linux 2.4.21-rc2) Marcelo Tosatti
2003-05-26 21:29       ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-26 21:35         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-05-27  4:21           ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-26 22:16       ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-05-26 22:18         ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-05-26 22:33           ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-05-27  0:35     ` Alan Cox
2003-05-27  4:39       ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-27  4:47         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-05-27  5:00           ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-27  8:38         ` Oliver Pitzeier
2003-05-27  8:44           ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-05-27  9:44             ` Oliver Pitzeier
2003-05-27 20:01           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-06-23  7:57             ` Oliver Pitzeier
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-27  9:12 Eric Valette
2003-05-26 21:53 john
     [not found] <20030523085010$1ac2@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <20030523180021$109a@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <20030523203017$0e66@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-05-24 11:46     ` Pascal Schmidt
2003-05-24 20:06       ` Nicholas Wourms
2003-05-28 23:11       ` Bill Davidsen
2003-05-11 19:08 Linux 2.4.21-rc2 Sven Krohlas
2003-05-22 15:19 ` Aix7xxx unstable in 2.4.21-rc2? (RE: Linux 2.4.21-rc2) Oliver Pitzeier
2003-05-22 15:31   ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-05-22 21:33     ` Scott McDermott
2003-05-23  8:45       ` Oliver Pitzeier
2003-05-23 17:52         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-05-23 20:19           ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-23 22:58         ` Scott McDermott
2003-05-26 18:51           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-05-23  7:17     ` Sven Krohlas
2003-05-26 12:54       ` Matthias Andree
2003-05-23  7:14   ` Sven Krohlas
2003-05-23  8:48     ` Oliver Pitzeier
2003-05-23  9:26       ` Sven Krohlas
2003-05-23  9:32         ` Oliver Pitzeier
2003-05-23 11:33           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-05-24  0:18         ` J.A. Magallon
2003-05-23 15:20       ` Disconnect

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1053732598.1951.13.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=willy@w.ods.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox