From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@wanadoo.es>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
miquels@cistron-office.nl
Subject: Re: [announce] procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements
Date: 29 May 2003 11:16:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1054206965.783.383.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030529180830.GG5643@fs.tum.de>
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 18:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Well, since I read Albert Cahalan's comment in Debian bug #172735 [1]
> I understand the people maintaining a different branch...
Exactly.
That bug is fixed in the official tree, fyi. A segfault, as you said, is
always a bug. An error message is displayed.
Once that bug is fixed, he will probably find that the inability to read
files in /proc also causes a crash. Such is the problem with this
duplicated effort. It sucks. I told Albert I would be happy to merge
each and every (sane) change he sends me. He refuses. To be fair, I also
refuse to work under his tree. His comments on this list is part of the
reason. For what its worth, he did not fork off and create his tree
until Rik starting work on the official tree.
In the end, all that matters to me really is that Red Hat and other big
distributions use my tree (apparently whether I maintain it or not) and
I use those distributions. If I used Debian, maybe my view would be
different. Or maybe I would make them switch trees :)
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-29 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-29 17:25 [announce] procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-29 18:08 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-05-29 11:16 ` Robert Love [this message]
2003-05-29 20:01 ` Vincent Hanquez
2003-05-29 15:40 ` Robert Love
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-31 2:36 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-30 18:59 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-30 8:12 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2003-05-30 8:20 ` cosmos
[not found] <1054270854.22088.617.camel@cube>
2003-05-30 6:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-01 4:53 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-05-30 16:56 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
[not found] ` <3ED788B5.2080203@wanadoo.es>
2003-05-31 1:25 ` Albert Cahalan
2003-05-30 5:30 Albert Cahalan
2003-05-28 15:09 Robert Love
2003-05-28 23:19 ` Phil Oester
2003-05-28 16:22 ` Robert Love
2003-05-28 23:59 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1054206965.783.383.camel@localhost \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquels@cistron-office.nl \
--cc=xose@wanadoo.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox