From: Daniel Goller <dgoller@satx.rr.com>
To: Michael Frank <mflt1@micrologica.com.hk>
Cc: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc6
Date: 31 May 2003 19:39:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1054427952.7416.2.camel@schlaefer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200305311912.29558.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk>
On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 06:12, Michael Frank wrote:
> On Saturday 31 May 2003 15:06, Daniel Goller wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 15:52, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:08:51PM -0500, Daniel Goller
> wrote:
> > > > i tried 2.4.21-rc6 as i was told it might fix the
> > > > mouse stalling on heavy disk IO problem and i would
> > > > like to report that it DOES fix them for the most
> > > > part, even certain compiles/benchmarks/stress tests
> > > > that could stall my pc for seconds now affect the
> > > > mouse for mere fractions of one second, situations
> > > > that used to cause short stalls are now a thing of
> > > > the past
> > > >
> > > > 2.4.21-rc6 is the best kernel i have tried to date
> > > > and i have tried many on my quest to get a smooth
> > > > mouse
> > >
> > > There are reports that 2.4.18 also "fixed" the problems
> > > with the mouse. Can you verify?
> >
>
> Yes, it performs similar to -rc6 but not nearly as good as
> 2.5.70.
>
> On 2.5.70 the mouse is really smooth all the time, scrollong
> of large pages in opera is fairly smooth most the time also
> with large disk io loads such as the script i posted
> earlier.
>
> Regards
> Michael
>
unfortunately the radeon dri is broken in 2.5.70 so i havent tried that
much, need to see if someone already suggests a fix for this unused int
(it seems unused to me, after a *quick* look through the file) i guess i
will have to subscribe now to lkml
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-01 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 19:08 Linux 2.4.21-rc6 Daniel Goller
2003-05-30 20:52 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-05-31 7:06 ` Daniel Goller
2003-05-31 11:12 ` Michael Frank
2003-06-01 0:39 ` Daniel Goller [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-29 0:55 Marcelo Tosatti
2003-05-29 1:22 ` Con Kolivas
2003-05-29 5:24 ` Marc Wilson
2003-05-29 5:34 ` Riley Williams
2003-05-29 5:57 ` Marc Wilson
2003-05-29 7:15 ` Riley Williams
2003-05-29 8:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-29 8:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-06-03 16:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-06-03 16:13 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-04 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
2003-06-05 2:10 ` Michael Frank
2003-06-03 16:30 ` Michael Frank
2003-06-03 16:53 ` Matthias Mueller
2003-06-03 16:59 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-03 17:03 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-03 18:02 ` Anders Karlsson
2003-06-03 21:12 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-06-03 21:18 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-03 17:23 ` Michael Frank
2003-06-04 14:56 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-06-04 4:04 ` Marc Wilson
2003-05-29 10:02 ` Con Kolivas
2003-05-29 18:00 ` Georg Nikodym
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1054427952.7416.2.camel@schlaefer \
--to=dgoller@satx.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=mflt1@micrologica.com.hk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox