Re: Question about style when converting from K&R to ANSI C.

[Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>]

On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 17:01, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Steven Cole writes:
> 
> > Here is a snippet of a patch from arch/ppc/xmon/ppc-opc.c:
> 
> Given that that file is a direct lift from binutils, I would rather
> update it with the latest version from binutils than waste time on
> reformatting, if it really bothers you.
> 
> My opinion is that changing code that works and that doesn't need
> attention is a waste of time.  If you're working on some code (or even
> if you are just trying to understand it and you want to make it clearer),
> then fine, reformat/re-indent/fix argument declarations/whatever, but
> if you're not, find something more productive to do.
> 
> Paul.
> 
The only purpose was to convert from K&R style:

int foo(bar, baz)
long bar;
long baz;
{
}

to ANSI C style:

int foo(long bar, long baz)
{
}

The purpose of the above is that Linus's new sparse checker purposefully
ignores K&R style, and he has indicated a willingness to accept patches
for the conversion.  In fact, he began the conversion himself.

If you'd rather me not touch arch/ppc/xmon/ppc-opc.c and xmon.c, then I
won't.  I was about ready to send those patches to you.  Please let me
know what you'd prefer.  The default will be no action. Thanks.

Steven