From: "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>
To: Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Different geometry settings for identical drives
Date: 02 Jun 2003 11:13:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1054577632.10369.5.camel@heat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30751917229@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz>
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 17:19, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 30 May 03 at 16:38, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 16:20, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > > On 30 May 03 at 15:46, Jeffrey Baker wrote:
> > >
> > > > hda: host protected area => 1
> > > > hda: setmax LBA 234441648, native 234375000
> > > > hda: 234375000 sectors (120000 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=232514/16/63, UDMA(100)
> > > > hdc: attached ide-disk driver.
> > > > hdc: host protected area => 1
> > > > hdc: setmax LBA 234441648, native 234375000
> > > > hdc: 234375000 sectors (120000 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=232514/16/63, UDMA(100)
> > > > hdd: attached ide-cdrom driver.
> > > > hdd: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM drive, 128kB Cache, UDMA(33)
> > > >
> > > > The result is that hda works fine but hdc doesn't. When I try to mke2fs
> > > > on the latter I see:
> > > >
> > > > hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > > > hdc: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=234441583, sector=232343808
>
> > The x86-64.org patch doesn't touch much outside of arch/x86_64. You are
> > right that CONFIG_IDE_STROKE is off:
>
> Ok, after looking at your kernel output more, it seems like that there is
> something strange with your drive: we asked for sector 232343808 (0xDD94900),
> but your drive reports SectorIdNotFound on sector 234441583 (0xDF94B6F),
> which is 2097775 (0x020026F) sectors away from sector we requested...
> As with LBA largest transfer length is 256 sectors, there is something
> wrong with your disk firmware... Which points to the dead disk
> together with some bug in the disk firmware (maybe drive wanted to
> report bug in sector DD9496F, but got it somehow wrong?). Can you
> try running Western's drive diagnostics on that drive?
I rebooted with the same drive but added hdc=14589,255,63, and now I can
make the filesystem perfectly well. So it does seem to be an issue with
the way the disk is addressed. Or I could just be fooling myself.
Later I can try swapping in identical hardware and see if the problem
persists. All these disks are brand new and were burned in and
qualified by the vendor.
-jwb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-02 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-31 0:19 Different geometry settings for identical drives Petr Vandrovec
2003-06-02 18:13 ` Jeffrey W. Baker [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-30 23:20 Petr Vandrovec
2003-05-30 23:38 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2003-05-30 22:46 Jeffrey Baker
2003-05-30 23:50 ` Andries Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1054577632.10369.5.camel@heat \
--to=jwbaker@acm.org \
--cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox