From: Martin List-Petersen <martin@list-petersen.dk>
To: Marc Sowen <marc.sowen@tu-harburg.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x
Date: 12 Jun 2003 20:07:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1055441222.26057.16.camel@loke> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001101c330f5$771bd7a0$0101230a@apollo>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1757 bytes --]
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:15, Marc Sowen wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I hope this is not too off-topic, but the fact is that neither the Intel
> PRO/Wireless 2100 (Centrino) chipset nor the Broadcom BCM9430x (e.g.
> Dell Truemobile 1180/1300/1400) chipset is currently supported in Linux
> due to FCC regulation problems.
>
> Anyhow, I plan to get a new Notebook within the next 2 or 3 weeks and I
> need to decide, whether to go for the Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 or the
> Broadcom BCM9430x chipset. I know it's hard to say, but what do you
> think, which company (Intel or Broadcom) is more likely to release the
> necessary documents and/or drivers for their chipsets? Both companys
> seem to ignore all inquiries concerning Linux support at the moment.
I think the chances are even. Buy were you get best value for money. I
bought the TM1400 and swapped it for now with a TM1150 sparepart (it's
not quite expensive).
Also a Orinico based PC-card is available for down to 50 EUR out there.
That would work until a driver is available.
Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot dk
--
A programmer is a person who passes as an exacting expert on the basis of
being able to turn out, after innumerable punching, an infinite series of
incomprehensible answers calculated with micrometric precisions from vague
assumptions based on debatable figures taken from inconclusive documents
and carried out on instruments of problematical accuracy by persons of
dubious reliability and questionable mentality for the avowed purpose of
annoying and confounding a hopelessly defenseless department that was
unfortunate enough to ask for the information in the first place.
-- IEEE Grid newsmagazine
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-12 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-12 15:15 Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x Marc Sowen
2003-06-12 15:16 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-06-12 17:20 ` Cisco Aironet mini-PCI wireless card (MPI-350) [Was: Re: Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x] Jan Mynarik
2003-06-12 17:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-13 10:58 ` Jan Mynarik
2003-06-13 16:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-12 20:37 ` Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x Anders Karlsson
2003-06-12 21:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-12 21:52 ` Anders Karlsson
2003-06-12 21:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-13 3:56 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-06-12 17:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-12 17:22 ` Disconnect
2003-06-12 18:07 ` Martin List-Petersen [this message]
2003-06-12 20:35 ` Anders Karlsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1055441222.26057.16.camel@loke \
--to=martin@list-petersen.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.sowen@tu-harburg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox