public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anders Karlsson <anders@trudheim.com>
To: Marc Sowen <marc.sowen@tu-harburg.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x
Date: 12 Jun 2003 21:35:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1055450157.3984.24.camel@tor.trudheim.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001101c330f5$771bd7a0$0101230a@apollo>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1200 bytes --]

On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 16:15, Marc Sowen wrote:
> Hi everybody,

Hullo,

> I hope this is not too off-topic, but the fact is that neither the Intel
> PRO/Wireless 2100 (Centrino) chipset nor the Broadcom BCM9430x (e.g.
> Dell Truemobile 1180/1300/1400) chipset is currently supported in Linux
> due to FCC regulation problems.

I have pointed out to Intel that 802.11b is _not_ subject to FCC
regulation problems and I hope they will release a driver for the
802.11b Intel/PRO 2100 mini-PCI cards sometime in the (near?) future. It
would be a sensible thing to do IMHO.

> Anyhow, I plan to get a new Notebook within the next 2 or 3 weeks and I
> need to decide, whether to go for the Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 or the
> Broadcom BCM9430x chipset. I know it's hard to say, but what do you
> think, which company (Intel or Broadcom) is more likely to release the
> necessary documents and/or drivers for their chipsets? Both companys
> seem to ignore all inquiries concerning Linux support at the moment.

How long is a piece of string? I get replies from Intel when I write to
them, but it is all a bit vague. They will not commit to anything, which
is is frustrating.

/A



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-12 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-12 15:15 Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x Marc Sowen
2003-06-12 15:16 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-06-12 17:20   ` Cisco Aironet mini-PCI wireless card (MPI-350) [Was: Re: Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x] Jan Mynarik
2003-06-12 17:46     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-13 10:58       ` Jan Mynarik
2003-06-13 16:29         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-12 20:37   ` Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x Anders Karlsson
2003-06-12 21:17     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-12 21:52       ` Anders Karlsson
2003-06-12 21:57         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-13  3:56     ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-06-12 17:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-12 17:22   ` Disconnect
2003-06-12 18:07 ` Martin List-Petersen
2003-06-12 20:35 ` Anders Karlsson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1055450157.3984.24.camel@tor.trudheim.com \
    --to=anders@trudheim.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.sowen@tu-harburg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox