From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263861AbTFXWYY (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:24:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263859AbTFXWYY (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:24:24 -0400 Received: from smtp1.ispsnet.net ([64.63.192.11]:44426 "EHLO ispsnet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263861AbTFXWYW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:24:22 -0400 Subject: Re: Sco vs. IBM From: Gerald Stuhrberg To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-87rZlxnyx/aRbM/NOmyc" Organization: Message-Id: <1056494253.3627.15.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2-3mdk Date: 24 Jun 2003 18:37:34 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-87rZlxnyx/aRbM/NOmyc Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just have one quick queston while all of you are debating. If how is it right for SCO to target IBM (or any company for that manner) if the code doesnt belong to them. Sorry for the ignorance. I missed something somewhere :/=20 Gerald --=-87rZlxnyx/aRbM/NOmyc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA++NKtVUs9jOJKOMQRAplgAJ9SNwyVwkhcf+OMLF8l/D0WOfR7dACdGchm Z6OdagVepkJomcEiabpU75Y= =qVRI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-87rZlxnyx/aRbM/NOmyc--