From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264346AbTGBS3k (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:29:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264362AbTGBS3k (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:29:40 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:6135 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264346AbTGBS3j (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:29:39 -0400 Subject: Re: scheduling with spinlocks held ? From: Robert Love To: Muthian Sivathanu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030702183645.79164.qmail@web40611.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030702183645.79164.qmail@web40611.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1057171587.1988.3408.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 (1.4.0-2) Date: 02 Jul 2003 11:46:27 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 11:36, Muthian Sivathanu wrote: > Is there a version of Ingo Molnar's patch for the 2.4 > line kernels ? No idea. I do not have a repository of Ingo's patches, I just remember him posting the SCHED_BATCH stuff a couple times. Like I said, google. Robert Love