Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity

William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-31T21:44:07Z

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> What makes me even more wondering is that 2.6.0-test1-wli tree does not suck
> at all for interactivity where no scheduler changes were made.

Could you make sure that you're not using 1A? (vanilla 1 and 1B are
both fine for these purposes).

Also, can I get a before/after of the following during an mp3 skip test?

vmstat 1 | tee -a vmstat.log

n=1; while true; do /usr/sbin/readprofile -n -m /boot/System.map-`uname -r` | sort -k 2,2 > profile.log.$n; n=$(( $n + 1 )); sleep 1; done

If you could stop the logging shortly after the skip in the kernel that
does skip (but not _too_ shortly after, give it at least 1 second) I
would be much obliged. The "before" picture is most important. An
"after" picture might also be helpful, but isn't strictly necessary.

Thanks.

-- wli