Re: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity

Con Kolivas
2003-07-30T10:47:08Z

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:31, Voluspa wrote:
> On 2003-07-30 8:41:46 Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > Wops! Wait a minute! O11.1 is great, but I've had a few XMMS skips
> > that I didn't have with O10. They're really difficult to reproduce,
>
> Can't reproduce your skips here with my light environment and O11.1 (on
> a PII 400, 128 meg mem, no desktop, Enlightenment as wm). Even as I
> write this my machine is under the most extreme load that I have -
> natural, not artificial:

Good test. Thanks.

> As to difference between O10 and O11.1 in feel... No comment. I'm too
> old to catch such small variations.

That's good, most of the difference was supposed to be in extremely unusual
circumstances. Felipe's issue is something I was concerned might happen (not
specifically an audio issue per se but audio is a sensitive way to pick it
up) which is why all testing is important.

Con