From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitor-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: C99 Initialisers
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:18:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060654733.684.267.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030812020226.GA4688@zip.com.au>
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 19:02, CaT wrote:
> Is there any interest ins omeone 'fixing up' as many structs in the
> kernel from the form:
Yes, indeed, especially for 2.6. There has been a lot of work already in
this direction -- not too much should be left.
> And if so, what form should I feed it back in? Big patches? 1 patch
> per file? 1 per dir?
Whatever makes most sense. One per directory is probably OK for most
things.
> Main reaosn I'm asking is that it's slowly being done but isn't in
> the janitor list of things to do yet. If it were I'd just do it. ;)
It should be in the list.
Convert GNU-style to C99-style. I think converting unnamed initializers
to named initializers is a Good Thing, too.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-12 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-12 2:02 C99 Initialisers CaT
2003-08-12 2:18 ` Robert Love [this message]
2003-08-12 2:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-12 2:45 ` Robert Love
2003-08-12 2:57 ` Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
2003-08-12 5:38 ` Greg KH
2003-08-12 9:01 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-08-12 10:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-12 10:19 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-08-12 11:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-12 16:54 ` Ian Hastie
2003-08-12 18:01 ` Greg KH
2003-08-12 23:53 ` Dave Jones
2003-08-13 0:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-13 0:23 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 0:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-14 5:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-08-13 15:52 ` Timothy Miller
2003-08-13 17:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 0:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 0:14 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-08-13 0:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 0:37 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-08-13 0:49 ` Dave Jones
2003-08-13 1:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 3:02 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-08-13 3:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 10:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-13 17:31 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 17:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-13 17:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 18:02 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 18:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 18:38 ` Russell King
2003-08-13 19:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 19:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-13 20:15 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 20:16 ` Dave Jones
2003-08-13 20:30 ` Matt Domsch
2003-08-13 20:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 21:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-13 22:24 ` Roman Zippel
2003-08-14 20:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-14 10:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-14 10:25 ` Gene Heskett
2003-08-14 10:52 ` jw schultz
2003-08-14 12:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-14 12:57 ` Andrey Panin
2003-08-14 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-08-13 21:06 ` Russell King
2003-08-13 21:17 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2003-08-13 17:50 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-13 17:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 17:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-13 17:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 18:03 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 17:58 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 18:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-13 18:09 ` Russell King
2003-08-13 20:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-13 21:17 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-13 21:26 ` Greg KH
2003-08-14 22:46 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-12 17:37 ` Dave Jones
2003-08-12 17:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-12 22:06 ` Ian Hastie
2003-08-13 15:54 ` CaT
2003-08-14 6:57 ` Maciej Soltysiak
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-12 16:52 Shureih, Tariq
[not found] <jFFu.7t8.15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jLKX.4KI.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jRnj.2dx.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jRwZ.2kJ.15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jRQi.2zQ.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jRZY.2Hw.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jS9J.2Np.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jUbt.57S.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jUuT.5kZ.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <k13k.22O.3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <k7Lq.7Gr.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-13 21:19 ` junkio
2003-08-13 22:18 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1060654733.684.267.camel@localhost \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=cat@zip.com.au \
--cc=kernel-janitor-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox