public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 002 of 9] knfsd: svcrpc: gss: fix failure on SVC_DENIED in integrity case
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:15:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060904231532.23071@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060905090617.21303.patches@notabene


From: J.Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>

If the request is denied after gss_accept was called, we shouldn't try to
wrap the reply.  We were checking the accept_stat but not the reply_stat.

To check the reply_stat in _release, we need a pointer to before (rather
than after) the verifier, so modify body_start appropriately.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>

### Diffstat output
 ./net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff .prev/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c ./net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c	2006-09-04 17:12:31.000000000 +1000
+++ ./net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c	2006-09-04 17:13:17.000000000 +1000
@@ -903,9 +903,9 @@ out_seq:
 struct gss_svc_data {
 	/* decoded gss client cred: */
 	struct rpc_gss_wire_cred	clcred;
-	/* pointer to the beginning of the procedure-specific results,
-	 * which may be encrypted/checksummed in svcauth_gss_release: */
-	u32				*body_start;
+	/* save a pointer to the beginning of the encoded verifier,
+	 * for use in encryption/checksumming in svcauth_gss_release: */
+	u32				*verf_start;
 	struct rsc			*rsci;
 };
 
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ svcauth_gss_accept(struct svc_rqst *rqst
 	if (!svcdata)
 		goto auth_err;
 	rqstp->rq_auth_data = svcdata;
-	svcdata->body_start = NULL;
+	svcdata->verf_start = NULL;
 	svcdata->rsci = NULL;
 	gc = &svcdata->clcred;
 
@@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ svcauth_gss_accept(struct svc_rqst *rqst
 		goto complete;
 	case RPC_GSS_PROC_DATA:
 		*authp = rpcsec_gsserr_ctxproblem;
+		svcdata->verf_start = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len;
 		if (gss_write_verf(rqstp, rsci->mechctx, gc->gc_seq))
 			goto auth_err;
 		rqstp->rq_cred = rsci->cred;
@@ -1110,7 +1111,6 @@ svcauth_gss_accept(struct svc_rqst *rqst
 					gc->gc_seq, rsci->mechctx))
 				goto auth_err;
 			/* placeholders for length and seq. number: */
-			svcdata->body_start = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len;
 			svc_putu32(resv, 0);
 			svc_putu32(resv, 0);
 			break;
@@ -1119,7 +1119,6 @@ svcauth_gss_accept(struct svc_rqst *rqst
 					gc->gc_seq, rsci->mechctx))
 				goto auth_err;
 			/* placeholders for length and seq. number: */
-			svcdata->body_start = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len;
 			svc_putu32(resv, 0);
 			svc_putu32(resv, 0);
 			break;
@@ -1150,14 +1149,21 @@ out:
 u32 *
 svcauth_gss_prepare_to_wrap(struct xdr_buf *resbuf, struct gss_svc_data *gsd)
 {
-	u32 *p;
+	u32 *p, verf_len;
+
+	p = gsd->verf_start;
+	gsd->verf_start = NULL;
 
-	p = gsd->body_start;
-	gsd->body_start = NULL;
+	/* If the reply stat is nonzero, don't wrap: */
+	if (*(p-1) != rpc_success)
+		return NULL;
+	/* Skip the verifier: */
+	p += 1;
+	verf_len = ntohl(*p++);
+	p += XDR_QUADLEN(verf_len);
 	/* move accept_stat to right place: */
 	memcpy(p, p + 2, 4);
-	/* Don't wrap in failure case: */
-	/* Counting on not getting here if call was not even accepted! */
+	/* Also don't wrap if the accept stat is nonzero: */
 	if (*p != rpc_success) {
 		resbuf->head[0].iov_len -= 2 * 4;
 		return NULL;
@@ -1283,7 +1289,7 @@ svcauth_gss_release(struct svc_rqst *rqs
 	if (gc->gc_proc != RPC_GSS_PROC_DATA)
 		goto out;
 	/* Release can be called twice, but we only wrap once. */
-	if (gsd->body_start == NULL)
+	if (gsd->verf_start == NULL)
 		goto out;
 	/* normally not set till svc_send, but we need it here: */
 	/* XXX: what for?  Do we mess it up the moment we call svc_putu32

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-04 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-04 23:15 [PATCH 000 of 9] knfsd: minor gss/v4 cleanups and major ACL surgery NeilBrown
2006-09-04 23:15 ` [PATCH 001 of 9] knfsd: svcrpc: gss: factor out some common wrapping code NeilBrown
2006-09-04 23:15 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2006-09-04 23:15 ` [PATCH 003 of 9] knfsd: svcrpc: use consistent variable name for the reply state NeilBrown
2006-09-04 23:15 ` [PATCH 004 of 9] knfsd: nfsd4: refactor exp_pseudoroot NeilBrown
2006-09-04 23:15 ` [PATCH 005 of 9] knfsd: nfsd4: clean up exp_pseudoroot NeilBrown
2006-09-04 23:15 ` [PATCH 006 of 9] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: relax the nfsv4->posix mapping NeilBrown
2006-09-04 23:15 ` [PATCH 007 of 9] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: fix inheritance NeilBrown
2006-09-04 23:16 ` [PATCH 008 of 9] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: simplify nfs4_acl_nfsv4_to_posix interface NeilBrown
2006-09-04 23:16 ` [PATCH 009 of 9] knfsd: nfsd4: acls: fix handling of zero-length acls NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1060904231532.23071@suse.de \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox