[PATCH 003 of 9] knfsd: svcrpc: use consistent variable name for the reply state

NeilBrown
2006-09-04T23:16:05Z

The rpc reply has multiple levels of error returns. The code here
contributes to the confusion by using "accept_statp" for a pointer to what
the rfc (and wireshark, etc.) refer to as the "reply_stat". (The confusion
is compounded by the fact that the rfc also has an "accept_stat" which
follows the reply_stat in the succesful case.)

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>

### Diffstat output
./net/sunrpc/svc.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c ./net/sunrpc/svc.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c 2006-09-04 17:09:50.000000000 +1000
+++ ./net/sunrpc/svc.c 2006-09-04 17:15:35.000000000 +1000
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
u32 dir, prog, vers, proc,
auth_stat, rpc_stat;
int auth_res;
- u32 *accept_statp;
+ u32 *reply_statp;

rpc_stat = rpc_success;

@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
goto err_bad_rpc;

/* Save position in case we later decide to reject: */
- accept_statp = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len;
+ reply_statp = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len;

svc_putu32(resv, xdr_zero); /* ACCEPT */

@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ err_bad_auth:
dprintk("svc: authentication failed (%d)\n", ntohl(auth_stat));
serv->sv_stats->rpcbadauth++;
/* Restore write pointer to location of accept status: */
- xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, accept_statp);
+ xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, reply_statp);
svc_putu32(resv, xdr_one); /* REJECT */
svc_putu32(resv, xdr_one); /* AUTH_ERROR */
svc_putu32(resv, auth_stat); /* status */