[PATCH 003 of 4] Use mutex_lock_nested for bd_mutex to avoid lockdep warning.

NeilBrown
2006-10-11T06:09:48Z

Now that the nesting in blkdev_{get,put} is simpler, adding
mutex_lock_nested is trivial.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>

### Diffstat output
./fs/block_dev.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff .prev/fs/block_dev.c ./fs/block_dev.c
--- .prev/fs/block_dev.c 2006-10-11 15:38:31.000000000 +1000
+++ ./fs/block_dev.c 2006-10-11 15:41:55.000000000 +1000
@@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ static int do_open(struct block_device *
}
owner = disk->fops->owner;

- mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, for_part);
if (!bdev->bd_openers) {
bdev->bd_disk = disk;
bdev->bd_contains = bdev;
@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static int __blkdev_put(struct block_dev
struct gendisk *disk = bdev->bd_disk;
struct block_device *victim = NULL;

- mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, for_part);
lock_kernel();
if (for_part)
bdev->bd_part_count--;