From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: [PATCH] knfsd: Fix race that can disable NFS server.
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:52:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1061020015244.26756@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20061020114959.26698.patches@notabene
This patch is suitable for just about any 2.6 kernel.
It should go in 2.6.19 and 2.6.18.2 and possible even the .17 and .16
stable series.
### Comments for Changeset
This is a long standing bug that seems to have only recently become
apparent, presumably due to increasing use of NFS over TCP - many
distros seem to be making it the default.
The SK_CONN bit gets set when a listening socket may be ready
for an accept, just as SK_DATA is set when data may be available.
It is entirely possible for svc_tcp_accept to be called with neither
of these set. It doesn't happen often but there is a small race in
svc_sock_enqueue as SK_CONN and SK_DATA are tested outside the
spin_lock. They could be cleared immediately after the test and
before the lock is gained.
This normally shouldn't be a problem. The sockets are non-blocking so
trying to read() or accept() when ther is nothing to do is not a problem.
However: svc_tcp_recvfrom makes the decision "Should I accept() or
should I read()" based on whether SK_CONN is set or not. This usually
works but is not safe. The decision should be based on whether it is
a TCP_LISTEN socket or a TCP_CONNECTED socket.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
### Diffstat output
./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c 2006-10-20 11:49:18.000000000 +1000
+++ ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c 2006-10-20 11:49:47.000000000 +1000
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
return 0;
}
- if (test_bit(SK_CONN, &svsk->sk_flags)) {
+ if (svsk->sk_sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
svc_tcp_accept(svsk);
svc_sock_received(svsk);
return 0;
parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-20 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20061020114959.26698.patches@notabene>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1061020015244.26756@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox