public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@sympatico.ca>
To: bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduler interactivity: timeslice calculation seem wrong
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:54:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1061337283.1123.8.camel@orbiter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bhtt73$8i4$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com>

> This could go in 2.7, though, or possibly in 2.6.x depending on how the
> powers that be feel. I think having the scheduler as a plugin is a win
> in terms of having whole special-use algorithms. It would have to be
> done *very* carefully to be sure it didn't add measurable overhead.

Well i was thinking of a compile time or at best boot time selection. It
should not add any mesurable overhead.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-19 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-19  2:54 scheduler interactivity: timeslice calculation seem wrong Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19  3:06 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19  4:07   ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19  5:23     ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19  6:54       ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 19:18         ` bill davidsen
2003-08-19 23:48           ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19 23:54           ` Eric St-Laurent [this message]
2003-08-19 19:01       ` bill davidsen
2003-08-20  0:15         ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-20  0:32           ` David Lang
2003-08-20  0:48             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-20  4:11               ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-20  4:36                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-20 13:59                 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-20 16:18                   ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-20  2:52         ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-19 19:02     ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 17:51   ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-20  2:41     ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-20 18:45       ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19  4:13 ` Con Kolivas
2003-08-19  4:23   ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19  4:29     ` Con Kolivas
2003-08-19  5:06       ` Eric St-Laurent
2003-08-19  6:18         ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1061337283.1123.8.camel@orbiter \
    --to=ericstl34@sympatico.ca \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox