public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ramón Rey Vicente󮠒" <retes_simbad@yahoo.es>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: "Diego Calleja García" <aradorlinux@yahoo.es>,
	jamagallon@able.es,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-2.4.22 released
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 04:01:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1061949659.1170.26.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030826215544.GI7038@fs.tum.de>

El mar, 26-08-2003 a las 23:55, Adrian Bunk escribió:

> > Reasons against:
> > <write here your opinion>
> >...
> 
> - ALSA is big and there are still some bugs in ALSA; there are more
>   urgent things to be fixed in 2.4
> - it's easy to use ALSA even when it's not inside the kernel
> - within a few months 2.6.0 will be released with ALSA included -
>   together with the point above I don't see a reason why ALSA would be
>   badly needed in 2.4

According to this last reason, most of the features added to the stable
tree never havent been merged because that features will be included in
development series... :)

Why many drivers are backported from 2.5/2.6 series to 2.4? I think the
reason is because is good for stable series take a few bits from latest
kernel code for prevent obsolete and/or very old drivers.

I know this have some risks of generating more bugs in stable kernel,
but in many times, has been made backports without so much resistance ;)
-- 
Ramón Rey Vicente       <ramon dot rey at hispalinux dot es>
        jabber ID       <rreylinux at jabber dot org>
------------------------------------------------------------
gpg public key ID 0xBEBD71D5 # http://pgp.escomposlinux.org/


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-27  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-25 11:48 linux-2.4.22 released Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-25  8:11 ` Enrico Demarin
2003-08-25 13:23 ` Matthias Andree
2003-08-25 13:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-08-25 13:35   ` Ramón Rey Vicente󮠒
2003-08-25 21:13     ` J.A. Magallon
2003-08-25 22:22       ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-26  0:21         ` Ramón Rey Vicente󮠒
2003-08-26 21:49           ` Diego Calleja García
2003-08-26 21:55             ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-26 22:29               ` Diego Calleja García
2003-08-27  2:15                 ` Ramón Rey Vicente󮠒
2003-08-27  5:21                   ` Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
2003-08-27  1:20               ` Chuck Campbell
2003-08-27  1:48                 ` David van Hoose
2003-08-27  1:55               ` David van Hoose
2003-08-27  3:28                 ` Kurt Wall
2003-08-27  2:01               ` Ramón Rey Vicente󮠒 [this message]
2003-08-27  4:12               ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-26 22:29             ` Matthias Andree
2003-08-27  9:47         ` Bas Mevissen
2003-08-26 13:55     ` Matthias Andree
2003-08-25 13:38   ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-25 22:34     ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-25 14:38   ` Yann Droneaud
2003-08-25 15:35   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-25 16:03   ` Luca Montecchiani
2003-08-25 19:18     ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-25 20:00   ` Edesio Costa e Silva
2003-08-25 20:10   ` Tom Rini
2003-08-26 13:19   ` Rene Rebe
2003-08-26 15:00     ` Alan Cox
2003-08-27  3:47       ` CaT
2003-08-26 16:11     ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-26 19:32     ` Greg KH
2003-08-26  1:52 ` cryptoapi doesn't build Tom Vier
2003-08-26 10:23   ` James Morris
2003-08-27 21:49     ` Tom Vier
2003-08-27 22:03     ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-08-26  4:25 ` [PATCH-2.4] make log buffer length selectable Willy Tarreau
2003-08-27 20:09   ` Tom Rini
2003-08-27 20:48     ` Willy Tarreau
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-25 16:25 linux-2.4.22 released Mikael Pettersson
2003-08-25 16:40 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-08-25 16:53 Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-25 17:20 Mikael Pettersson
2003-08-27 21:45 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-08-26 22:25 John Bradford
2003-08-27  2:11 ` Ramón Rey Vicente󮠒
2003-08-27  6:10 John Bradford
2003-08-28  2:31 ` bill davidsen
2003-08-27 11:10 Vid Strpic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1061949659.1170.26.camel@debian \
    --to=retes_simbad@yahoo.es \
    --cc=aradorlinux@yahoo.es \
    --cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox