From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261292AbTH2PTb (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:19:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261325AbTH2PTb (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:19:31 -0400 Received: from miranda.zianet.com ([216.234.192.169]:35844 "HELO miranda.zianet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261292AbTH2PSu (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:18:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] M68k invalid vs. illegal From: Steven Cole To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Linux Kernel Development In-Reply-To: <200308291451.h7TEp7BC005902@callisto.of.borg> References: <200308291451.h7TEp7BC005902@callisto.of.borg> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1062170273.20076.25.camel@spc> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk Date: 29 Aug 2003 09:17:54 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 08:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > M68k: Use `invalid' instead of `illegal' (from Steven Cole in 2.5.x) > For the record, the original idea for these changes should be credited to Richard B. Johnson via this post: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105278255404767&w=2 Alan verified that Richard was right, and all I did was the grunt work. Steven