* 1:1 M:N threading
@ 2003-09-14 18:44 Breno
2003-09-14 19:06 ` Rémi Colinet
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Breno @ 2003-09-14 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kernel List
Hi.
What kind of threading kernel 2.4 and 2.6 do ? 1:1 or M:N ?
thanks
Breno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 1:1 M:N threading
2003-09-14 18:44 1:1 M:N threading Breno
@ 2003-09-14 19:06 ` Rémi Colinet
2003-09-14 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-14 19:11 ` Robert Love
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rémi Colinet @ 2003-09-14 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Breno; +Cc: Kernel List
Breno wrote:
>Hi.
>
>What kind of threading kernel 2.4 and 2.6 do ? 1:1 or M:N ?
>
>
>thanks
>Breno
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
Hello,
For 2.6, the default is NGPT (see
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/pthreads/) which is 1:1.
Regards
Rémi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 1:1 M:N threading
2003-09-14 18:44 1:1 M:N threading Breno
2003-09-14 19:06 ` Rémi Colinet
@ 2003-09-14 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-14 19:11 ` Robert Love
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2003-09-14 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Breno; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Sul, 2003-09-14 at 19:44, Breno wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What kind of threading kernel 2.4 and 2.6 do ? 1:1 or M:N ?
The kernel doesn't impose a specific model although its certainly
strongly oriented to 1:1 threading models by simply making the kernel
threading/locking so efficient the M:N stuff isnt worth the overhead
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 1:1 M:N threading
2003-09-14 18:44 1:1 M:N threading Breno
2003-09-14 19:06 ` Rémi Colinet
2003-09-14 19:08 ` Alan Cox
@ 2003-09-14 19:11 ` Robert Love
2003-09-16 15:04 ` Memory allocation Breno
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robert Love @ 2003-09-14 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Breno; +Cc: Kernel List
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 14:44, Breno wrote:
> What kind of threading kernel 2.4 and 2.6 do ? 1:1 or M:N ?
Both do 1:1.
But nothing stops you from running an M:1 or M:N threading library in
user-space on top of the kernel abstraction.
Robert Love
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 1:1 M:N threading
@ 2003-09-15 9:12 jpo234
2003-09-15 14:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: jpo234 @ 2003-09-15 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: remi.colinet; +Cc: linux-kernel
remi.colinet@wanadoo.fr wrote:
> For 2.6, the default is NGPT (see
> http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/pthreads/) which is 1:1.
NGPT is frozen and in maintenance mode (which is a different
wording for "dead"). See
http://www-124.ibm.com/pthreads/docs/announcement
The new default Linux pthread implementation is RedHats NPTL. See
http://people.redhat.com/~drepper/nptl-design.pdf
for details, which btw. is 1:1 as well.
Regards
jpo
__________________________________________________________________
McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network.
Comprehensive protection for your entire computer. Get your free trial today!
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/computing/mcafee/index.jsp?promo=393397
Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge. Download Now!
http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 1:1 M:N threading
2003-09-15 9:12 1:1 M:N threading jpo234
@ 2003-09-15 14:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Arcangeli @ 2003-09-15 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jpo234; +Cc: remi.colinet, linux-kernel
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:12:59AM -0400, jpo234@netscape.net wrote:
> remi.colinet@wanadoo.fr wrote:
> > For 2.6, the default is NGPT (see
> > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/pthreads/) which is 1:1.
>
> NGPT is frozen and in maintenance mode (which is a different
> wording for "dead"). See
> http://www-124.ibm.com/pthreads/docs/announcement
and btw, NGPT isn't 1:1 but M:N.
Andrea
/*
* If you refuse to depend on closed software for a critical
* part of your business, these links may be useful:
*
* rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.5/
* rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.4/
* http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
*
* svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.6/trunk
* svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.4/trunk
*/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Memory allocation
2003-09-14 19:11 ` Robert Love
@ 2003-09-16 15:04 ` Breno
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Breno @ 2003-09-16 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Love; +Cc: Kernel List
Hi,
When i use kmem_cache_alloc() to create a vma and return addr of this vma ,
the pages have already been allocated and mapped ? or i must use
mk_pte/set_pte to map the page to my vma ?
att
Breno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-16 15:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-14 18:44 1:1 M:N threading Breno
2003-09-14 19:06 ` Rémi Colinet
2003-09-14 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-14 19:11 ` Robert Love
2003-09-16 15:04 ` Memory allocation Breno
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-15 9:12 1:1 M:N threading jpo234
2003-09-15 14:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox