Re: Linux 2.6.0-test6 (compile statistics)

John Cherry
2003-10-06T20:39:24Z

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:44, Jesper Juhl wrote:
[snip]
>
> I was wondering if there would be any point in doing these builds with
> "allnoconfig" as well?
> Could this possibly flush out some warnings/errors that only occur when
> something is left out?
>
>

The compile regressions now build with allnoconfig as well for both
Linus' tree and Andrew's tree. Check out...

http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/

BTW, the latest compile stats for test6-mm3 and test6-mm4 are:

Kernel version: 2.6.0-test6-mm4
Kernel build:
Making bzImage (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors
Making modules (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors
Making bzImage (allnoconfig): 1 warnings, 0 errors
Making bzImage (allyesconfig): 179 warnings, 1 errors
Making modules (allyesconfig): 9 warnings, 0 errors
Making bzImage (allmodconfig): 3 warnings, 0 errors
Making modules (allmodconfig): 234 warnings, 1 errors

Kernel version: 2.6.0-test6-mm3
Kernel build:
Making bzImage (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors
Making modules (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors
Making bzImage (allnoconfig): 1 warnings, 0 errors
Making bzImage (allyesconfig): 178 warnings, 1 errors
Making modules (allyesconfig): 9 warnings, 0 errors
Making bzImage (allmodconfig): 3 warnings, 0 errors
Making modules (allmodconfig): 252 warnings, 1 errors

John