Re: [patch] Input cleanups for 2.5.29 [2/2]

Brad Hards
2002-07-30T21:48:47Z

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 07:42, Alexander Viro wrote:
<snip>
> Strictly speaking, there might be a DISadvantage - IIRC, there's nothing to
> stop gcc from
> #define uint8_t unsigned long long /* it is at least 8 bits */
Here is an extract from <linux/types.h>
typedef __u8 uint8_t;
typedef __u16 uint16_t;

> ICBW, but wasn't uint<n>_t only promised to be at least <n> bits?
I am not sure I understand the point you are trying to make.

Brad
--
http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black.