From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263210AbTJKDnk (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:43:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263214AbTJKDnk (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:43:40 -0400 Received: from fmr04.intel.com ([143.183.121.6]:7561 "EHLO caduceus.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263210AbTJKDnj (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:43:39 -0400 Subject: 2.6.0-test7 build failure: !CONFIG_PCI From: Len Brown To: "Linux-Kernel (E-mail)" Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1065843784.4112.49.camel@dhcppc4> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 10 Oct 2003 23:43:05 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Does anybody build X86 without CONFIG_PCI? Build fails if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640 is set: drivers/built-in.o(.init.text+0x59df): In function `ide_setup': : undefined reference to `cmd640_vlb' drivers/built-in.o(.init.text+0x5aef): In function `probe_for_hwifs': : undefined reference to `ide_probe_for_cmd640x' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 The problem is that these variables are defined in drivers/ide/pci/cmd640.c, which is protected by CONFIG_PCI; but they're used when CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640, which doesn't require CONFIG_PCI. --- More interesting (to me) is that it also fails if CONFIG_ACPI is set: drivers/built-in.o(.init.text+0x825): In function `acpi_bus_init': : undefined reference to `eisa_set_level_irq' drivers/acpi/bus.c: #ifdef CONFIG_X86 /* Ensure the SCI is set to level-triggered, active-low */ if (acpi_ioapic) mp_config_ioapic_for_sci(acpi_fadt.sci_int); else eisa_set_level_irq(acpi_fadt.sci_int); #endif Should we not be calling eisa_set_level_irq()? thanks, -Len