From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263702AbTKADs1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:48:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263716AbTKADs1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:48:27 -0500 Received: from goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.18]:8909 "EHLO goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263702AbTKADs0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:48:26 -0500 Subject: Re: oops with pci=biosirq in 2.4.22 (not in 2.4.18) From: Brad Langhorst To: Mike Fedyk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20031101024356.GB3907@matchmail.com> References: <1067654215.19557.412.camel@up> <20031101024356.GB3907@matchmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1067658502.19557.419.camel@up> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:48:23 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Originating-IP: 209.91.48.165 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 21:43, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 09:36:56PM -0500, Brad Langhorst wrote: > > I don't have time to try more kernels and narrow the window at the > > moment. > > > > perhaps this is enough information for somebody who knows where to look. > > Most likely not. > > Did you get any problems with 2.4.21? > > What about 2.4.23-pre? > > Too much between 2.4.22 and 2.4.18 changed to use this little info to track > anything down... i feared as much - unfortunately i just don't have time to spend on this at the moment. I figure a weak ass bug report is better than no bug report - at least somebody googling might be able to save some time now... It's working in 2.6.0 so i guess 2.4 will just have to live with the bug. thanks for the response! brad