From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932841AbXBTGgB (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:36:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964782AbXBTGf7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:35:59 -0500 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:56170 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932841AbXBTGfq (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:35:46 -0500 From: NeilBrown To: Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:00 +1100 Message-Id: <1070220063500.16163@suse.de> X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org md tries to warn the user if they e.g. create a raid1 using two partitions of the same device, as this does not provide true redundancy. However it also warns if a raid0 is created like this, and there is nothing wrong with that. At the place where the warning is currently printer, we don't necessarily know what level the array will be, so move the warning from the point where the device is added to the point where the array is started. Signed-off-by: Neil Brown ### Diffstat output ./drivers/md/md.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff .prev/drivers/md/md.c ./drivers/md/md.c --- .prev/drivers/md/md.c 2007-02-20 17:10:06.000000000 +1100 +++ ./drivers/md/md.c 2007-02-20 17:12:16.000000000 +1100 @@ -1296,27 +1296,17 @@ static struct super_type super_types[] = .sync_super = super_1_sync, }, }; - -static mdk_rdev_t * match_dev_unit(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *dev) -{ - struct list_head *tmp; - mdk_rdev_t *rdev; - - ITERATE_RDEV(mddev,rdev,tmp) - if (rdev->bdev->bd_contains == dev->bdev->bd_contains) - return rdev; - - return NULL; -} static int match_mddev_units(mddev_t *mddev1, mddev_t *mddev2) { - struct list_head *tmp; - mdk_rdev_t *rdev; + struct list_head *tmp, *tmp2; + mdk_rdev_t *rdev, *rdev2; ITERATE_RDEV(mddev1,rdev,tmp) - if (match_dev_unit(mddev2, rdev)) - return 1; + ITERATE_RDEV(mddev2, rdev2, tmp2) + if (rdev->bdev->bd_contains == + rdev2->bdev->bd_contains) + return 1; return 0; } @@ -1325,8 +1315,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pending_raid_disks); static int bind_rdev_to_array(mdk_rdev_t * rdev, mddev_t * mddev) { - mdk_rdev_t *same_pdev; - char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE], b2[BDEVNAME_SIZE]; + char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE]; struct kobject *ko; char *s; @@ -1342,14 +1331,6 @@ static int bind_rdev_to_array(mdk_rdev_t else mddev->size = rdev->size; } - same_pdev = match_dev_unit(mddev, rdev); - if (same_pdev) - printk(KERN_WARNING - "%s: WARNING: %s appears to be on the same physical" - " disk as %s. True\n protection against single-disk" - " failure might be compromised.\n", - mdname(mddev), bdevname(rdev->bdev,b), - bdevname(same_pdev->bdev,b2)); /* Verify rdev->desc_nr is unique. * If it is -1, assign a free number, else @@ -3109,6 +3090,36 @@ static int do_md_run(mddev_t * mddev) return -EINVAL; } + if (pers->sync_request) { + /* Warn if this is a potentially silly + * configuration. + */ + char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE], b2[BDEVNAME_SIZE]; + mdk_rdev_t *rdev2; + struct list_head *tmp2; + int warned = 0; + ITERATE_RDEV(mddev, rdev, tmp) { + ITERATE_RDEV(mddev, rdev2, tmp2) { + if (rdev < rdev2 && + rdev->bdev->bd_contains == + rdev2->bdev->bd_contains) { + printk(KERN_WARNING + "%s: WARNING: %s appears to be" + " on the same physical disk as" + " %s.\n", + mdname(mddev), + bdevname(rdev->bdev,b), + bdevname(rdev2->bdev,b2)); + warned = 1; + } + } + } + if (warned) + printk(KERN_WARNING + "True protection against single-disk" + " failure might be compromised.\n"); + } + mddev->recovery = 0; mddev->resync_max_sectors = mddev->size << 1; /* may be over-ridden by personality */ mddev->barriers_work = 1;