public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>
To: Darrell Michaud <dmichaud@wsi.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>,
	Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xfs.org>,
	Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, XFS List <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: XFS for 2.4
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:21:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070382114.2392.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1070381443.5316.260.camel@atherne>

I second this as well. I'm sure there are others. XFS is a good option
to have for official FS inclusion and I'm *very* happy it's in 2.6. If
it were in 2.4, that *may* make adoption of 2.6 for some, slow in coming
along. While that may be true, I see that most will eventually want to
take advantage of all 2.6 has to offer, but if XFS were in the official
tree, then that may be one less piece of guess work needed when
upgrading from 2.4 to 2.6 with regards to FS maintenance. (i.e. same
version of XFS in both trees == possible same reliability, etc)

On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 10:10, Darrell Michaud wrote:
> As a user it would be very beneficial for me to have XFS support in
> the
> official 2.4 kernel tree. XFS been stable and "2.4 integration-ready"
> for a long time, and 2.4 is going to be used in certain environments
> for
> a long time, if only because it's easier to upgrade a 2.4 kernel to a
> newer 2.4 kernel than to upgrade to a 2.6 kernel. It seems like an
> easy
> case to make.
> 
> I use other filesystems and some funky drivers as well.. and I'm
> always
> very happy to see useful backports show up in the 2.4 tree. Thank you!
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 10:50, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 05:18, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > [snip] 
> > > > Also I'm not completly sure if the generic changes are fine and
> I dont
> > > > like the XFS code in general.
> > > Ahh so the real truth comes out.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is there a reason for your sudden dislike of the XFS code?
> > 
> > I always disliked the XFS code. 
> > 
> > > or is this just an arbitrary general dislike for unknown or
> unstated
> > > reasons?
> > 
> > I dont like the style of the code. Thats a personal issue, though,
> and 
> > shouldnt matter.
> > 
> > The bigger point is that XFS touches generic code and I'm not sure
> if that 
> > can break something.
> > 
> > Why it matters so much for you to have XFS in 2.4 ? 
> > 
> -- 
> Darrell Michaud <dmichaud@wsi.com>
-- 
Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>
Coremetrics, Inc.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-02 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-01  6:20 XFS for 2.4 Nathan Scott
2003-12-01  9:24 ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-01  9:44   ` Stefan Smietanowski
2003-12-01  9:45     ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-01 14:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-01 22:10   ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-01 22:20     ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-02  0:23       ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-02 11:22         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-02 18:05           ` Austin Gonyou
2003-12-02 19:55           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-12-02 20:05             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-02 20:16             ` Lawrence Walton
2003-12-03 19:01           ` bill davidsen
2003-12-03 20:45             ` Willy Tarreau
2003-12-03 21:17               ` bill davidsen
2003-12-03 21:48                 ` Joel Becker
2003-12-03 22:17                   ` bill davidsen
2003-12-03 22:08                 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-12-04  5:21                   ` Willy Tarreau
2003-12-04  0:34               ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2003-12-04  5:33                 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-12-04 10:13                   ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2003-12-02 11:18     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-02 11:48       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-02 15:34       ` Russell Cattelan
2003-12-02 15:50         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-02 16:10           ` Darrell Michaud
2003-12-02 16:21             ` Austin Gonyou [this message]
2003-12-02 16:28             ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-02 16:57               ` venom
2003-12-02 17:41               ` Stefan Smietanowski
2003-12-02 18:01           ` Russell Cattelan
2003-12-02 16:13         ` Jeremy Jackson
2003-12-02  0:51   ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2003-12-02  1:26     ` Marcos D. Marado Torres
2003-12-14  1:08   ` 2.4 vs 2.6 Jan Rychter
2003-12-14  1:01     ` Roberto Sanchez
2003-12-14 11:23       ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-14 18:09         ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2003-12-14  1:53     ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2003-12-14  2:01     ` coderman
2003-12-14 20:23       ` tabris
2003-12-14  7:05     ` Voicu Liviu
2003-12-14 16:01       ` Roberto Sanchez
2003-12-14 17:32         ` Voicu Liviu
2003-12-15  7:23           ` Harry McGregor
2003-12-15  7:51             ` Voicu Liviu
2003-12-14 11:24     ` Frederik Deweerdt
2003-12-01 21:00 ` XFS for 2.4 Dan Yocum
2003-12-01 21:50   ` Bryan Whitehead
2003-12-01 22:01     ` Jeffrey E. Hundstad
2003-12-01 22:13     ` Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
2003-12-02  2:54     ` Joshua Schmidlkofer
2003-12-02 11:02   ` Maciej Soltysiak
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-02 17:45 Murthy Kambhampaty
2003-12-02 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-03 20:10   ` bill davidsen
2003-12-02 18:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-02 19:10   ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-03  0:13     ` Eric Sandall
2003-12-03 20:12       ` bill davidsen
2003-12-02 18:02 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-02 18:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]     ` <20031202181146.A27567@adic.com>
2003-12-02 18:19       ` Steve Lord
2003-12-02 18:20     ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-02 18:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-02 18:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-02 19:12           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-02 20:10             ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-02 20:11         ` viro
2003-12-03 20:51       ` bill davidsen
2003-12-03 20:44   ` bill davidsen
2003-12-03 21:06     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-03 22:07     ` grundig
2003-12-03 22:48       ` bill davidsen
2003-12-02 18:34 Murthy Kambhampaty
2003-12-04  1:27 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-12-04  2:40 ` Bernd Eckenfels

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1070382114.2392.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=austin@coremetrics.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cattelan@xfs.org \
    --cc=dmichaud@wsi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
    --cc=nathans@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox