public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 002 of 35] Replace bio_cur_sectors with blk_rq_cur_sectors.
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:15:55 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070731021555.25086@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070731112539.22428.patches@notabene


All calls to bio_cur_sectors are for the first bio in a 'struct request'.
A future patch will make the discovery of this number dependant on
information in the request.  So change the function to take a 
'struct request *' instread of a 'struct bio *', and make it a real
function as more code will need to be added.

One place wants the current bytes rather than sectors, so the
'real function' we create is blk_rq_cur_bytes, and 
blk_rq_cur_sectors divides this value by 512.

Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>

### Diffstat output
 ./block/ll_rw_blk.c      |   18 ++++++++++++------
 ./drivers/ide/ide-cd.c   |   11 ++++++-----
 ./drivers/ide/ide-io.c   |    2 +-
 ./include/linux/bio.h    |    1 -
 ./include/linux/blkdev.h |    5 +++++
 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff .prev/block/ll_rw_blk.c ./block/ll_rw_blk.c
--- .prev/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2007-07-31 11:20:42.000000000 +1000
+++ ./block/ll_rw_blk.c	2007-07-31 11:20:43.000000000 +1000
@@ -2902,10 +2902,11 @@ static void init_request_from_bio(struct
 	req->errors = 0;
 	req->hard_sector = req->sector = bio->bi_sector;
 	req->hard_nr_sectors = req->nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
-	req->current_nr_sectors = req->hard_cur_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(bio);
+	req->bio = req->biotail = bio;
+	req->current_nr_sectors = req->hard_cur_sectors =
+		blk_rq_cur_sectors(req);
 	req->nr_phys_segments = bio_phys_segments(req->q, bio);
 	req->nr_hw_segments = bio_hw_segments(req->q, bio);
-	req->bio = req->biotail = bio;
 	req->buffer = blk_rq_data(req);	/* see ->buffer comment above */
 	req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);
 	req->rq_disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk;
@@ -2976,7 +2977,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request
 			 * not touch req->buffer either...
 			 */
 			req->buffer = blk_rq_data(req);
-			req->current_nr_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(bio);
+			req->current_nr_sectors = blk_rq_cur_sectors(req);
 			req->hard_cur_sectors = req->current_nr_sectors;
 			req->sector = req->hard_sector = bio->bi_sector;
 			req->nr_sectors = req->hard_nr_sectors += nr_sectors;
@@ -3369,7 +3370,7 @@ static void blk_recalc_rq_sectors(struct
 		    (rq->sector <= rq->hard_sector)) {
 			rq->sector = rq->hard_sector;
 			rq->nr_sectors = rq->hard_nr_sectors;
-			rq->hard_cur_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(rq->bio);
+			rq->hard_cur_sectors = blk_rq_cur_sectors(rq);
 			rq->current_nr_sectors = rq->hard_cur_sectors;
 			rq->buffer = blk_rq_data(rq);
 		}
@@ -3673,13 +3674,13 @@ void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request_queu
 
 	rq->nr_phys_segments = bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
 	rq->nr_hw_segments = bio_hw_segments(q, bio);
-	rq->current_nr_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(bio);
-	rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors;
 	rq->hard_nr_sectors = rq->nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
 	rq->data_len = bio->bi_size;
 
 	rq->bio = rq->biotail = bio;
 	rq->buffer = blk_rq_data(rq);
+	rq->current_nr_sectors = blk_rq_cur_sectors(rq);
+	rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors;
 }
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_rq_bio_prep);
@@ -3691,6 +3692,11 @@ void *blk_rq_data(struct request *rq)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_rq_data);
 
+int blk_rq_cur_bytes(struct request *rq)
+{
+	return bio_iovec(rq->bio)->bv_len;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_rq_cur_bytes);
 
 int kblockd_schedule_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {

diff .prev/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c ./drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
--- .prev/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c	2007-07-31 11:20:42.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/ide/ide-cd.c	2007-07-31 11:20:43.000000000 +1000
@@ -1173,7 +1173,8 @@ static ide_startstop_t cdrom_read_intr (
 
 	/* First, figure out if we need to bit-bucket
 	   any of the leading sectors. */
-	nskip = min_t(int, rq->current_nr_sectors - bio_cur_sectors(rq->bio), sectors_to_transfer);
+	nskip = min_t(int, rq->current_nr_sectors - blk_rq_cur_sectors(rq),
+		      sectors_to_transfer);
 
 	while (nskip > 0) {
 		/* We need to throw away a sector. */
@@ -1273,7 +1274,7 @@ static int cdrom_read_from_buffer (ide_d
 	   represent the number of sectors to skip at the start of a transfer
 	   will fail.  I think that this will never happen, but let's be
 	   paranoid and check. */
-	if (rq->current_nr_sectors < bio_cur_sectors(rq->bio) &&
+	if (rq->current_nr_sectors < blk_rq_cur_sectors(rq) &&
 	    (rq->sector & (sectors_per_frame - 1))) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: cdrom_read_from_buffer: buffer botch (%ld)\n",
 			drive->name, (long)rq->sector);
@@ -1308,7 +1309,7 @@ static ide_startstop_t cdrom_start_read_
 	nskip = rq->sector & (sectors_per_frame - 1);
 	if (nskip > 0) {
 		/* Sanity check... */
-		if (rq->current_nr_sectors != bio_cur_sectors(rq->bio) &&
+		if (rq->current_nr_sectors != blk_rq_cur_sectors(rq) &&
 			(rq->sector & (sectors_per_frame - 1))) {
 			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: cdrom_start_read_continuation: buffer botch (%u)\n",
 				drive->name, rq->current_nr_sectors);
@@ -1389,7 +1390,7 @@ static void restore_request (struct requ
 		rq->nr_sectors += n;
 		rq->sector -= n;
 	}
-	rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(rq->bio);
+	rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors = blk_rq_cur_sectors(rq);
 	rq->hard_nr_sectors = rq->nr_sectors;
 	rq->hard_sector = rq->sector;
 	rq->q->prep_rq_fn(rq->q, rq);
@@ -1770,7 +1771,7 @@ static ide_startstop_t cdrom_newpc_intr(
 		 */
 		if (rq->bio) {
 			ptr = blk_rq_data(rq);
-			blen = bio_iovec(rq->bio)->bv_len;
+			blen = blk_rq_cur_bytes(rq);
 		}
 
 		if (!ptr) {

diff .prev/drivers/ide/ide-io.c ./drivers/ide/ide-io.c
--- .prev/drivers/ide/ide-io.c	2007-07-31 11:20:42.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/ide/ide-io.c	2007-07-31 11:20:43.000000000 +1000
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ static ide_startstop_t ide_dma_timeout_r
 		goto out;
 
 	rq->sector = rq->bio->bi_sector;
-	rq->current_nr_sectors = bio_iovec(rq->bio)->bv_len >> 9;
+	rq->current_nr_sectors = blk_rq_cur_sectors(rq);
 	rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors;
 	rq->buffer = blk_rq_data(rq);
 out:

diff .prev/include/linux/bio.h ./include/linux/bio.h
--- .prev/include/linux/bio.h	2007-07-31 11:20:42.000000000 +1000
+++ ./include/linux/bio.h	2007-07-31 11:20:43.000000000 +1000
@@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ struct bio {
 #define bio_offset(bio)		bio_iovec((bio))->bv_offset
 #define bio_segments(bio)	((bio)->bi_vcnt - (bio)->bi_idx)
 #define bio_sectors(bio)	((bio)->bi_size >> 9)
-#define bio_cur_sectors(bio)	(bio_iovec(bio)->bv_len >> 9)
 #define bio_barrier(bio)	((bio)->bi_rw & (1 << BIO_RW_BARRIER))
 #define bio_sync(bio)		((bio)->bi_rw & (1 << BIO_RW_SYNC))
 #define bio_failfast(bio)	((bio)->bi_rw & (1 << BIO_RW_FAILFAST))

diff .prev/include/linux/blkdev.h ./include/linux/blkdev.h
--- .prev/include/linux/blkdev.h	2007-07-31 11:20:42.000000000 +1000
+++ ./include/linux/blkdev.h	2007-07-31 11:20:43.000000000 +1000
@@ -701,6 +701,11 @@ extern void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct
 				  struct request *, int, rq_end_io_fn *);
 extern int blk_verify_command(unsigned char *, int);
 extern void *blk_rq_data(struct request *);
+extern int blk_rq_cur_bytes(struct request *);
+static inline int blk_rq_cur_sectors(struct request *rq)
+{
+	return blk_rq_cur_bytes(rq) >> 9;
+}
 
 static inline struct request_queue *bdev_get_queue(struct block_device *bdev)
 {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-31  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-31  2:15 [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support for stacked devices NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:15 ` [PATCH 001 of 35] Replace bio_data with blk_rq_data NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:15 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 003 of 35] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 004 of 35] Merge blk_recount_segments into blk_recalc_rq_segments NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 005 of 35] Stop updating bi_idx, bv_len, bv_offset when a request completes NeilBrown
2007-08-01 14:54   ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 006 of 35] Only call bi_end_io once for any bio NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 007 of 35] Drop 'size' argument from bio_endio and bi_end_io NeilBrown
2007-08-01 15:17   ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 008 of 35] Introduce bi_iocnt to count requests sharing the one bio NeilBrown
2007-08-01 15:49   ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 009 of 35] Remove overloading of bi_hw_segments in raid5 NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 010 of 35] New function blk_req_append_bio NeilBrown
2007-08-01 15:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 011 of 35] Stop exporting blk_rq_bio_prep NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 012 of 35] Share code between init_request_from_bio and blk_rq_bio_prep NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:16 ` [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge NeilBrown
2007-08-01 15:57   ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02  3:37     ` Neil Brown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 014 of 35] Change blk_phys/hw_contig_segment to take requests, not bios NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 015 of 35] Move hw_front_size and hw_back_size from bio to request NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 016 of 35] Centralise setting for REQ_NOMERGE NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 017 of 35] Fix various abuse of bio fields in umem.c NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 018 of 35] Remove bi_idx NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 019 of 35] Convert bio_for_each_segment to fill in a fresh bio_vec NeilBrown
2007-08-01 16:21   ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 020 of 35] Add bi_offset and allow a bio to reference only part of a bi_io_vec NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 021 of 35] Teach umem.c about bi_offset and to limit to bi_size NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 022 of 35] Teach dm-crypt to honour bi_offset and bi_size NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 023 of 35] Teach pktcdvd.c " NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 024 of 35] Allow request bio list not to end with NULL NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:17 ` [PATCH 025 of 35] Treat rq->hard_nr_sectors as setting an overriding limit in the size of the request NeilBrown
2007-08-01 17:44   ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02  3:31     ` Neil Brown
2007-08-02  5:03       ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31  2:18 ` [PATCH 026 of 35] Split any large bios that arrive at __make_request NeilBrown
2007-08-01 17:56   ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02  0:49     ` Neil Brown
2007-08-02  2:59       ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02  3:16         ` Neil Brown
2007-07-31  2:18 ` [PATCH 028 of 35] Split arbitrarily large requests to md/raid0 and md/linear NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:18 ` [PATCH 029 of 35] Teach md/raid10 to split arbitrarily large bios NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:18 ` [PATCH 030 of 35] Teach raid5 to split incoming bios NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:18 ` [PATCH 031 of 35] Use bio_multi_split to fully split bios for pktcdvd NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:18 ` [PATCH 032 of 35] Remove blk_queue_merge_bvec and bio_split and related code NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:18 ` [PATCH 033 of 35] Simplify stacking of IO restrictions NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:18 ` [PATCH 034 of 35] Simplify bio_add_page and raid1/raid10 resync which use it NeilBrown
2007-07-31  2:18 ` [PATCH 035 of 35] Simplify bio splitting in dm NeilBrown
2007-07-31 15:28 ` [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support for stacked devices Avi Kivity
2007-08-01 14:37   ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-01 15:52     ` John Stoffel
2007-08-01 15:59       ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02  3:43       ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1070731021555.25086@suse.de \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox