From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 017 of 35] Fix various abuse of bio fields in umem.c
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:17:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070731021715.25333@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070731112539.22428.patches@notabene
umem.c:
advances bi_idx and bi_sector to track where it is up to.
But it is only ever doing this on one bio, so the updated
fields can easily be kept elsewhere (current_*).
updates bi_size, but never uses the updated values, so
this isn't needed.
reuses bi_phys_segments to count how many iovecs have been
completely. As the completion happens sequentiually, we
can store this information outside the bio too.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/block/umem.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff .prev/drivers/block/umem.c ./drivers/block/umem.c
--- .prev/drivers/block/umem.c 2007-07-31 11:20:51.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/block/umem.c 2007-07-31 11:21:02.000000000 +1000
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ struct cardinfo {
* have been written
*/
struct bio *bio, *currentbio, **biotail;
+ int current_idx;
+ sector_t current_sector;
struct request_queue *queue;
@@ -121,6 +123,7 @@ struct cardinfo {
struct mm_dma_desc *desc;
int cnt, headcnt;
struct bio *bio, **biotail;
+ int idx;
} mm_pages[2];
#define DESC_PER_PAGE ((PAGE_SIZE*2)/sizeof(struct mm_dma_desc))
@@ -380,12 +383,16 @@ static int add_bio(struct cardinfo *card
dma_addr_t dma_handle;
int offset;
struct bio *bio;
+ struct bio_vec *vec;
+ int idx;
int rw;
int len;
bio = card->currentbio;
if (!bio && card->bio) {
card->currentbio = card->bio;
+ card->current_idx = card->bio->bi_idx;
+ card->current_sector = card->bio->bi_sector;
card->bio = card->bio->bi_next;
if (card->bio == NULL)
card->biotail = &card->bio;
@@ -394,15 +401,17 @@ static int add_bio(struct cardinfo *card
}
if (!bio)
return 0;
+ idx = card->current_idx;
rw = bio_rw(bio);
if (card->mm_pages[card->Ready].cnt >= DESC_PER_PAGE)
return 0;
- len = bio_iovec(bio)->bv_len;
- dma_handle = pci_map_page(card->dev,
- bio_page(bio),
- bio_offset(bio),
+ vec = bio_iovec_idx(bio, idx);
+ len = vec->bv_len;
+ dma_handle = pci_map_page(card->dev,
+ vec->bv_page,
+ vec->bv_offset,
len,
(rw==READ) ?
PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE : PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
@@ -410,6 +419,8 @@ static int add_bio(struct cardinfo *card
p = &card->mm_pages[card->Ready];
desc = &p->desc[p->cnt];
p->cnt++;
+ if (p->bio == NULL)
+ p->idx = idx;
if ((p->biotail) != &bio->bi_next) {
*(p->biotail) = bio;
p->biotail = &(bio->bi_next);
@@ -419,7 +430,7 @@ static int add_bio(struct cardinfo *card
desc->data_dma_handle = dma_handle;
desc->pci_addr = cpu_to_le64((u64)desc->data_dma_handle);
- desc->local_addr= cpu_to_le64(bio->bi_sector << 9);
+ desc->local_addr = cpu_to_le64(card->current_sector << 9);
desc->transfer_size = cpu_to_le32(len);
offset = ( ((char*)&desc->sem_control_bits) - ((char*)p->desc));
desc->sem_addr = cpu_to_le64((u64)(p->page_dma+offset));
@@ -435,10 +446,10 @@ static int add_bio(struct cardinfo *card
desc->control_bits |= cpu_to_le32(DMASCR_TRANSFER_READ);
desc->sem_control_bits = desc->control_bits;
- bio->bi_sector += (len>>9);
- bio->bi_size -= len;
- bio->bi_idx++;
- if (bio->bi_idx >= bio->bi_vcnt)
+ card->current_sector += (len >> 9);
+ idx++;
+ card->current_idx = idx;
+ if (idx >= bio->bi_vcnt)
card->currentbio = NULL;
return 1;
@@ -474,10 +485,12 @@ static void process_page(unsigned long d
last=1;
}
page->headcnt++;
- idx = bio->bi_phys_segments;
- bio->bi_phys_segments++;
- if (bio->bi_phys_segments >= bio->bi_vcnt)
+ idx = page->idx;
+ page->idx++;
+ if (page->idx >= bio->bi_vcnt) {
page->bio = bio->bi_next;
+ page->idx = page->bio->bi_idx;
+ }
pci_unmap_page(card->dev, desc->data_dma_handle,
bio_iovec_idx(bio,idx)->bv_len,
@@ -547,7 +560,6 @@ static int mm_make_request(struct reques
pr_debug("mm_make_request %llu %u\n",
(unsigned long long)bio->bi_sector, bio->bi_size);
- bio->bi_phys_segments = bio->bi_idx; /* count of completed segments*/
spin_lock_irq(&card->lock);
*card->biotail = bio;
bio->bi_next = NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-31 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-31 2:15 [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support for stacked devices NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:15 ` [PATCH 001 of 35] Replace bio_data with blk_rq_data NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:15 ` [PATCH 002 of 35] Replace bio_cur_sectors with blk_rq_cur_sectors NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 003 of 35] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 004 of 35] Merge blk_recount_segments into blk_recalc_rq_segments NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 005 of 35] Stop updating bi_idx, bv_len, bv_offset when a request completes NeilBrown
2007-08-01 14:54 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 006 of 35] Only call bi_end_io once for any bio NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 007 of 35] Drop 'size' argument from bio_endio and bi_end_io NeilBrown
2007-08-01 15:17 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 008 of 35] Introduce bi_iocnt to count requests sharing the one bio NeilBrown
2007-08-01 15:49 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 009 of 35] Remove overloading of bi_hw_segments in raid5 NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 010 of 35] New function blk_req_append_bio NeilBrown
2007-08-01 15:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 011 of 35] Stop exporting blk_rq_bio_prep NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 012 of 35] Share code between init_request_from_bio and blk_rq_bio_prep NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 013 of 35] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge NeilBrown
2007-08-01 15:57 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02 3:37 ` Neil Brown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 014 of 35] Change blk_phys/hw_contig_segment to take requests, not bios NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 015 of 35] Move hw_front_size and hw_back_size from bio to request NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 016 of 35] Centralise setting for REQ_NOMERGE NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 018 of 35] Remove bi_idx NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 019 of 35] Convert bio_for_each_segment to fill in a fresh bio_vec NeilBrown
2007-08-01 16:21 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 020 of 35] Add bi_offset and allow a bio to reference only part of a bi_io_vec NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 021 of 35] Teach umem.c about bi_offset and to limit to bi_size NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 022 of 35] Teach dm-crypt to honour bi_offset and bi_size NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 023 of 35] Teach pktcdvd.c " NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 024 of 35] Allow request bio list not to end with NULL NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 025 of 35] Treat rq->hard_nr_sectors as setting an overriding limit in the size of the request NeilBrown
2007-08-01 17:44 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02 3:31 ` Neil Brown
2007-08-02 5:03 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-31 2:18 ` [PATCH 026 of 35] Split any large bios that arrive at __make_request NeilBrown
2007-08-01 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02 0:49 ` Neil Brown
2007-08-02 2:59 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02 3:16 ` Neil Brown
2007-07-31 2:18 ` [PATCH 028 of 35] Split arbitrarily large requests to md/raid0 and md/linear NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:18 ` [PATCH 029 of 35] Teach md/raid10 to split arbitrarily large bios NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:18 ` [PATCH 030 of 35] Teach raid5 to split incoming bios NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:18 ` [PATCH 031 of 35] Use bio_multi_split to fully split bios for pktcdvd NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:18 ` [PATCH 032 of 35] Remove blk_queue_merge_bvec and bio_split and related code NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:18 ` [PATCH 033 of 35] Simplify stacking of IO restrictions NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:18 ` [PATCH 034 of 35] Simplify bio_add_page and raid1/raid10 resync which use it NeilBrown
2007-07-31 2:18 ` [PATCH 035 of 35] Simplify bio splitting in dm NeilBrown
2007-07-31 15:28 ` [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support for stacked devices Avi Kivity
2007-08-01 14:37 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-01 15:52 ` John Stoffel
2007-08-01 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-02 3:43 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1070731021715.25333@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox