From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: switch to hrtimer for TSC deadline timer when L2 guest is running
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 04:14:57 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1071146205.4257957.1467792897523.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160706080901.ywlvgksrhpdyspmv@hz-desktop>
> On 07/06/16 16:01, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > On 07/06/16 09:46, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 06/07/2016 08:05, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > >> > Nested preemption timer is emulated by hrtimer, so it doesn't
> > > >> > influence vmcs02, why this is needed?
> > > > Nested (L2) preemption timer is not affected for sure, and this patch
> > > > is to fix another problem caused by using L1 preemption timer for L1
> > > > TSC deadline timer. When we use L1 VMX preemption timer for L1 TSC
> > > > deadline timer, we intend to use the pin-based exec config and the VMX
> > > > preemption timer value in vmcs01. However, when L2 guest is running,
> > > > vmcs02 is loaded as the current VMCS so that a different VMX
> > > > preemption timer config is used (i.e. VMX preemption timer is disabled
> > > > in prepare_vmcs02()). If we still use preemption timer for L1 TSC
> > > > deadline timer at this moment, then L1 TSC deadline timer will not be
> > > > able to be triggered when L2 guest is running.
> > >
> > > The right fix then is to set the pin-based controls in prepare_vmcs02,
> > > based on vcpu->arch.hv_deadline_tsc.
> >
> > Then KVM needs to distinguish L1 and L2 VMEXITs for preemption timer
> > (or does KVM already have this?). The current implementation which
> > uses a separate hrtimer for L2 preemption timer can easily distinguish
> > them.
>
> And L1 hypervisor may also want to use preemption timer for L2
> guest. In this case, L0 KVM can not reuse preemption timer for both L1
> and L2.
The vmcs12's preemption timer is emulated by KVM through a separate hrtimer,
so KVM would only use the vmcs02 preemption timer for the L1 APIC timer.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 5:10 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: switch to hrtimer for TSC deadline timer when L2 guest is running Haozhong Zhang
2016-07-06 5:37 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 6:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 6:05 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-07-06 7:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 8:01 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-07-06 8:09 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-07-06 8:14 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-07-06 8:21 ` Haozhong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1071146205.4257957.1467792897523.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=haozhong.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
--cc=yunhong.jiang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox