From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:38:10 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1071376690.2187.25.camel@laptop-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031212192252.GA465@elf.ucw.cz>
That's a bit rough, isn't it Pavel? I fully agree that the power
management support in 2.4 is incomplete (just as is the case in 2.6),
but there is power management support in 2.4, and it is being used.
Regards,
Nigel
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 08:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged.
>
> 2.4 has no driver model => swsusp for 2.4 is a hack. Its nice and
> working, but it is still a hack.
> Pavel
--
My work on Software Suspend is graciously brought to you by
LinuxFund.org.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-14 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-10 21:39 RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree Michael Frank
2003-12-10 21:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-11 19:36 ` Michael Frank
2003-12-10 21:55 ` Matt H.
2003-12-12 19:22 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-14 4:38 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2003-12-14 11:03 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1071376690.2187.25.camel@laptop-linux \
--to=ncunningham@clear.net.nz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhf@linuxmail.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox