From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263303AbTLOHZF (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 02:25:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263325AbTLOHZF (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 02:25:05 -0500 Received: from deagol.email.Arizona.EDU ([128.196.133.142]:12700 "EHLO smtpgate.email.arizona.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263303AbTLOHZC (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 02:25:02 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.4 vs 2.6 From: Harry McGregor To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3FDC9EC8.1000908@mscc.huji.ac.il> References: <20031201062052.GA2022@frodo> <3FDC0BAC.8020909@mscc.huji.ac.il> <3FDC8957.4000602@yahoo.es> <3FDC9EC8.1000908@mscc.huji.ac.il> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Tucson Center Support Group - USGS Message-Id: <1071473021.30831.5.camel@Sony> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:23:41 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 10:32, Voicu Liviu wrote: > Because i use lvm2 and I could not find the way to get back to lvm1 > Any clue? How about using the patches for 2.4 to give you LVM2 support? http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/ We have it running on one system right now, in fact it is part of the reason that we manually patched our 2.4.21 to fix the local root exploit that was fixed in 2.4.23, we just had too many external patches (FreeSwan, DeviceMapper, XFS, etc) on that system, to do patch and recompile in a reasonable amount of time. Harry > Liviu