public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Meder <chris@onestepahead.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4 regression when running gnomemeeting
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:49:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1071938978.1025.48.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031220111917.GA18267@elte.hu>

On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 12:19, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Christian Meder <chris@onestepahead.de> wrote:
> 
> > That would leave me with two possibilities: 2.6. is doing something
> > different in the gnomemeeting case or gnomemeeting is doing something
> > different in the 2.6 case. A cursory look at the gnomemeeting sources
> > didn't give me the impression that it's doing anything which would be
> > affected by 2.6 deployment but I'll ask on the gnomemeeting-devel list
> > for advice.
> 
> yep, i've looked at the source too and it doesnt do anything that 
> changed in 2.6 from an interactivity POV.

Stefan Bruens pointed out on the gnomemeeting-devel list that pwlib
which gnomemeeting is using executes sched_yield and that perhaps there
is a problem akin to the openoffice busy-loop on sched_yield() problem
earlier this year. I found the following sched_yield code in pwlib 1.5.2
in src/ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx:


> static BOOL PAssertThreadOp(int retval,
>                             unsigned & retry,
>                             const char * funcname,
>                             const char * file,
>                             unsigned line)
> {
>   if (retval == 0) {
>     PTRACE_IF(2, retry > 0, "PWLib\t" << funcname << " required " << retry << "
> retries!");
>     return FALSE;
>   }
>                                                                                 
>   if (errno == EINTR || errno == EAGAIN) {
>     if (++retry < 1000) {
> #if defined(P_RTEMS)
>       sched_yield();
> #else
>       usleep(10000); // Basically just swap out thread to try and clear blockage
> #endif
>       return TRUE;   // Return value to try again
>     }
>     // Give up and assert
>   }
>                                                                                 
>   PAssertFunc(file, line, NULL, psprintf("Function %s failed", funcname));
>   return FALSE;
> }

Is this obviously broken for 2.6 usage ?


			Christian

-- 
Christian Meder, email: chris@onestepahead.de
 
What's the railroad to me ?
I never go to see
Where it ends.
It fills a few hollows,
And makes banks for the swallows, 
It sets the sand a-blowing,
And the blackberries a-growing.
                      (Henry David Thoreau)
 





  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-20 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-19 20:11 2.6 vs 2.4 regression when running gnomemeeting Christian Meder
2003-12-19 20:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-19 23:30   ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  0:21     ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  0:37       ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  0:48         ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  1:11           ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  1:26             ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  1:52               ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  2:38                 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  2:55                   ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-20  3:32                     ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  3:50                       ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  4:16                         ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  4:32                           ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  5:15                             ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  8:31                               ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-20 11:19                               ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-20 16:17                                 ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20 16:49                                 ` Christian Meder [this message]
2003-12-20 17:42                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-21  1:40                                     ` Christian Meder
2003-12-21  8:57                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-22  1:19                                         ` Christian Meder
2003-12-22  1:47                                           ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-22  8:48                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-20 23:29                                   ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20 22:20                         ` Matthias Andree
2003-12-21 19:23                           ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-22 10:54                       ` Andrew McGregor
2003-12-22 11:15                         ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-22 12:51                         ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-22 13:25                         ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20 19:34 ` Marc Schiffbauer
2003-12-21  1:49   ` Christian Meder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1071938978.1025.48.camel@localhost \
    --to=chris@onestepahead.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox