From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: Difference between select and enable in Kconfig
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 18:22:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1072027326.2684.72.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031220205433.195037e8.rddunlap@osdl.org>
Hi Randy,
> | while porting some of my drivers to 2.6 which use the firmware loader
> | for example I came to the question whether to use select or enable to
> | achieve the desired result. Looking at the documention don't gives me
> | the answer and from zconf.l I feel that both options are the same. Can
> | anyone please explain me the differences if there are any?
>
> I agree, they look like synonyms.
> There's nothing about "enable" in Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
> and there's evidence in zconf.l (as you mention) and in menu.c
> that they are the same:
>
> case P_SELECT:
> sym2 = prop_get_symbol(prop);
> if ((sym->type != S_BOOLEAN && sym->type != S_TRISTATE) ||
> (sym2->type != S_BOOLEAN && sym2->type != S_TRISTATE))
> fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:warning: enable is only allowed with boolean and tristate symbols\n",
> ~~~~~~
so both options achieve the same result. Why do we have two different
options for the same stuff? Should we not remove one?
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-21 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-21 2:46 Difference between select and enable in Kconfig Marcel Holtmann
2003-12-21 4:54 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-12-21 17:22 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2003-12-21 17:34 ` Roman Zippel
2003-12-21 18:06 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1072027326.2684.72.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox