From: Gabor MICSKO <gmicsko@szintezis.hu>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [test] exec-shield vs. paxtest 0.9.5 horrible results
Date: 22 Dec 2003 11:54:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1072090466.1471.4.camel@gmicsko03> (raw)
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5# uname -a
Linux gmicsko03 2.6.0 #1 Thu Dec 18 12:32:44 CET 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5# echo 2 >
/proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5# cat
/proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
2
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5# ./paxtest
PaXtest - Copyright(c) 2003 by Peter Busser <peter@adamantix.org>
Released under the GNU Public Licence version 2 or later
It may take a while for the tests to complete
Test results:
PaXtest - Copyright(c) 2003 by Peter Busser <peter@adamantix.org>
Released under the GNU Public Licence version 2 or later
Executable anonymous mapping : Vulnerable
Executable bss : Vulnerable
Executable data : Vulnerable
Executable heap : Vulnerable
Executable stack : Vulnerable
Executable anonymous mapping (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable bss (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable data (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable heap (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable shared library bss (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable shared library data (mprotect): Vulnerable
Executable stack (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Anonymous mapping randomisation test : 16 bits (guessed)
Heap randomisation test (ET_EXEC) : 14 bits (guessed)
Heap randomisation test (ET_DYN) : 13 bits (guessed)
Main executable randomisation (ET_EXEC) : No randomisation
Main executable randomisation (ET_DYN) : 12 bits (guessed)
Shared library randomisation test : 12 bits (guessed)
Stack randomisation test (SEGMEXEC) : 17 bits (guessed)
Stack randomisation test (PAGEEXEC) : 17 bits (guessed)
Return to function (strcpy) : Vulnerable
Return to function (strcpy, RANDEXEC) : Return to function
(memcpy) : Vulnerable
Return to function (memcpy, RANDEXEC) : Vulnerable
Executable shared library bss : Vulnerable
Executable shared library data : Vulnerable
Writable text segments : Vulnerable
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5#
Any idea?
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-22 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-22 10:54 Gabor MICSKO [this message]
2003-12-22 11:09 ` [test] exec-shield vs. paxtest 0.9.5 horrible results Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-22 11:25 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1072090466.1471.4.camel@gmicsko03 \
--to=gmicsko@szintezis.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox