From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265116AbTLWMND (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 07:13:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265119AbTLWMND (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 07:13:03 -0500 Received: from AGrenoble-101-1-2-242.w193-253.abo.wanadoo.fr ([193.253.227.242]:50329 "EHLO awak.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265116AbTLWMNB convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 07:13:01 -0500 Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev From: Xavier Bestel To: "Bradley W. Allen" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Message-Id: <1072181538.672.23.camel@nomade> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:12:19 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le mar 23/12/2003 à 12:51, Bradley W. Allen a écrit : > DevFS was written by an articulate person who solved a lot of > problems. udev sounds more like a thug who's smug about winning, > not explaining himself, saying things like "oh, the other guy > disappeared, so who cares, you have to use my code, too bad it sucks". [...] > I've spent two hours on this problem, and that's absurd; Man, you've convinced me ! You've spent *two* hours on this problem ? Woah, these K-H and Viro guys must be dorks if they don't subscribe to your theories. Who are they to think their opinion matters more than yours, who spent *two* hours on this problem ? Are you the new DevFS's maintainer ?