From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263523AbTLXCk2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:40:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263544AbTLXCk2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:40:28 -0500 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([141.154.95.10]:35304 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263523AbTLXCkB (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:40:01 -0500 Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev From: Rob Love To: Stan Bubrouski Cc: Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1072233153.2947.171.camel@duergar> References: <1072232566.3826.8.camel@fur> <1072233153.2947.171.camel@duergar> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072233598.3826.18.camel@fur> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-8) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:39:59 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 21:32, Stan Bubrouski wrote: > Do you think Linus would even accept patches for this? I'm just > curious, are bugfixes still going into it at all? I am sure that Andrew would take patches. But I also suspect that devfs won't be around forever. While it is, though, there seems no reason not to take patches that fix bugs. Rob Love