From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263571AbTLXLVF (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 24 Dec 2003 06:21:05 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263584AbTLXLVF
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 24 Dec 2003 06:21:05 -0500
Received: from AGrenoble-101-1-4-151.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr ([217.128.202.151]:47523
	"EHLO awak.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S263571AbTLXLVD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Dec 2003 06:21:03 -0500
Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
To: Stan Bubrouski <stan@ccs.neu.edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1072240684.2947.184.camel@duergar>
References: <E1AYl4w-0007A5-R3@O.Q.NET>
	 <20031224151314.700680fe.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
	 <1072240684.2947.184.camel@duergar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Message-Id: <1072264524.3555.4.camel@nomade>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 12:15:25 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Le mer 24/12/2003 à 05:38, Stan Bubrouski a écrit :

> And umm, can we kill this thread, I foresee a flamefest in the works.


I have to admit that devfs is the best, hands down, at a crucial lkml
exercise: the flamefest. It seems even after it'll die, it will continue
to attract devotees and flames.