public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.1
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:59:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10745567584195@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10745567584080@kroah.com>

ChangeSet 1.1474.98.4, 2004/01/14 11:11:06-08:00, mhoffman@lightlink.com

[PATCH] I2C: link asb100 in the proper order

* Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> [2004-01-09 22:58:58 +0100]:

> Shouldn't the asb100 be listed first, the same way the w83781d is, since
> it has subclients? I would even put asb100 before w83781d, since for now
> the w83781d driver will try to handle ASB100 chips too, thus preventing
> the asb100 driver from being used if both drivers are built-in.

You're right, thanks

* * * * *

This patch fixes the link order for asb100 sensors chip driver.


 drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


diff -Nru a/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile
--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile	Mon Jan 19 15:32:50 2004
+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile	Mon Jan 19 15:32:50 2004
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
 # Makefile for the kernel hardware sensors chip drivers.
 #
 
-# w83781d goes first, as it can override other driver's addresses.
+# asb100, then w83781d go first, as they can override other drivers' addresses.
+obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ASB100)	+= asb100.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_W83781D)	+= w83781d.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1021)	+= adm1021.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_ASB100)	+= asb100.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_EEPROM)	+= eeprom.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_IT87)	+= it87.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_LM75)	+= lm75.o


  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-20  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-19 23:57 [BK PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.1 Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59   ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59     ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59       ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-01-19 23:59         ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59           ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59             ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59               ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                 ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                   ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                     ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                       ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                         ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                           ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                             ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                               ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                 ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                   ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                     ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                       ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                         ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                           ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                             ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                               ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                                 ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                                   ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                                     ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                                       ` Greg KH
2004-01-19 23:59                                                         ` Greg KH
2004-01-21 21:50                                                 ` Jean Delvare
2004-01-21 23:56                                                   ` Greg KH
2004-01-31  8:56                                                     ` Jean Delvare
2004-01-31 15:23                                                       ` Greg KH
2004-01-20 22:03     ` Jean Delvare
2004-01-20 22:07       ` Greg KH
2004-01-21 20:47         ` Jean Delvare
2004-01-24  1:14           ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10745567584195@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox